涉外民事管辖权立法完善研究

发布时间：2018-04-13 20:29

本文选题：立法论 + 涉外民事管辖权　；参考：《政治与法律》2013年08期

【摘要】：立法者和国内学界对民事诉讼法涉外编的漠视,导致涉外民事管辖权立法陷入尴尬的境地。2012年我国《民事诉讼法》修订后,涉外民事管辖权的规定不仅没有得到完善,反被删减为两条。为适应全球化时代的挑战,在立法模式上,无论采用内外管辖权统一的单轨制还是内外管辖权分立的双轨制,均应考虑内外管辖权之间的实质差异,不能一概论之。在立法体例及内容上,应区分国内管辖权与涉外管辖权,理顺管辖权条款之间的逻辑关系,避免法条的碎片化和零散化,增加"不方便法院"等解决管辖权冲突的规定。在立法价值取向上,维护国家主权是基石和首要目标,同时应兼顾公正与便利,尽可能扩大管辖依据,强化专属管辖,适当控制协议管辖,并增加对弱方当事人有利的管辖权依据。
[Abstract]:The neglect of foreign civil procedure law by legislators and domestic scholars has led to the embarrassment of foreign civil jurisdiction legislation. After the revision of our Civil procedure Law in 2012, the provisions of foreign civil jurisdiction have not been perfected.Instead, it was deleted to two.In order to adapt to the challenge of the era of globalization, in the legislative mode, whether the monorail system of unified internal or external jurisdiction or the dual track system of separation of internal and external jurisdiction, the essential difference between internal and external jurisdiction should be considered, and the introduction should not be made.In the legislative style and content, we should distinguish domestic jurisdiction from foreign jurisdiction, straighten out the logical relationship between jurisdiction clauses, avoid fragmentation and fragmentation of legal articles, and add "inconvenient courts" to resolve jurisdiction conflicts.In terms of legislative value orientation, safeguarding national sovereignty is the cornerstone and primary goal. At the same time, it should take account of justice and convenience, expand the jurisdictional basis as far as possible, strengthen exclusive jurisdiction, and properly control the jurisdiction by agreement.And to increase the benefit of the weak party to the jurisdiction of the basis.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学国际法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金“涉外民事诉讼程序修改理念与制度完善研究”(项目编号:12BFX137) 上海市教育委员会重点学科建设项目(项目编号:J51103)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】