认罪认罚何以从宽:误区与正解——反思效率优先的改革主张

发布时间：2018-04-14 02:01

本文选题：认罪认罚从宽 + 司法改革　；参考：《法学研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：完善认罪认罚从宽制度是当下司法改革的重要议题之一。有关这一制度如何在实践中落地,目前存在着将提高诉讼效率作为改革的主要目的,应在参考美国辩诉交易制度的基础上,构建认罪认罚后从快处理的刑事程序等认识误区。这些认识误区源于论者对我国刑事司法实践所面临的问题的本质,和对美国辩诉交易制度的产生背景及制约因素的误读。认罪认罚从宽制度改革应致力于解决被追诉人认罪认罚却得不到适当、有效从宽处理的实践难题,因此,这一改革应主要从实体法层面着手,明确认罪认罚后从宽处理的具体规则;在程序法方面则应完善认罪认罚从宽案件审理的程序构造,更好地保障实体从宽的实现;相应地,要防止相关改革设计与相关举措过度追求效率。
[Abstract]:Perfecting the lenient system of guilty admission and punishment is one of the important topics in the current judicial reform.As to how this system falls in practice, there are some misunderstandings about how to improve the efficiency of litigation as the main purpose of the reform, and to construct a criminal procedure which can be dealt with quickly after pleading guilty and penalizing on the basis of referring to the American plea bargaining system.These misunderstandings originate from the essence of the problems facing the criminal justice practice in our country and the misreading of the background and restrictive factors of the American plea bargaining system.The reform of leniency system of guilty admission and punishment should be devoted to solving the practical problem that the guilty plea and punishment is not appropriate and can not be dealt with effectively. Therefore, this reform should mainly be carried out from the substantive law level.Make clear the specific rules of leniency after pleading guilty and penalizing; in the aspect of procedural law, we should perfect the procedural structure of lenient cases of guilty pleas and penalization, and better protect the realization of substantive leniency.To prevent the related reform design and related measures excessive pursuit of efficiency.
【作者单位】：国家2011协同创新计划"司法文明协同创新中心";四川大学法学院;
【分类号】：D925.2;D926.5

【相似文献】