论房屋登记案件中民行交叉问题的处理

发布时间：2018-04-14 02:01

本文选题：房屋登记 + 民行交叉　；参考：《湘潭大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着房屋登记领域纠纷的日益增多,房屋登记案件中民行交叉问题如何处理也越来越受到社会各界的广泛关注。面对司法实践中处理房屋登记案件民行交叉问题的存在的缺陷日益凸现,深入研究房屋登记案件中民行交叉问题的处理,对于统一司法裁判尺度、提高司法效率、保障司法权威、提升司法公信力具有重大的理论价值与实践指导意义。根据民事争议与行政争议之间的关系,房屋登记案件中民行交叉问题主要有涉及行政争议的民事争议、涉及民事争议的行政争议及民事争议与行政争议并重等三种类型,其产生的原因是多方面的,既有现代社会行政权不断扩张的因素,又有房屋登记的形式审查难以满足登记的公定力要求导致的,还有行政诉讼与民事诉讼的目的不同引起的。我国关于房屋登记案件中的行民交叉问题处理的立法规定,主要体现在《民事诉讼法》、《行政诉讼法》及相关司法解释的有关规定中,这些法律法规及司法解释的规定较为混杂,并且各个规定之间存在相互冲突现象。这就导致我国房屋登记案件的审理过程中,人民法院在处理民行交叉问题的时候无所适从,做法各异,具体主要有先民后行、先行后民及一并审理等三种模式。针对我国房屋登记案件民行交叉问题处理中存在的问题,构建我国房屋登记案件中民行交叉问题解决机制,应遵循司法统一、立体保护、诉讼效率等的基本原则,选择一元制处理模式,在确定由同一审判组织审理房屋登记案件、明确房屋登记案件中的所有主体共同参加诉讼的基础上,建立统一的房屋登记案件立案指引制度,理顺房屋登记案件具体审判操作程序,以使房屋登记案件中的民行交叉问题一次性彻底有效解决。
[Abstract]:With the increasing number of housing registration disputes, housing registration case for China how to deal with the issue of cross is also more and more attention from all walks of life. In the face of the defects of housing registration cases of civil cross problems in judicial practice have become increasingly prominent, in-depth study of housing registration problem in China for the treatment of cross cases, the unified justice scale, improve judicial efficiency, safeguard judicial authority, has great theoretical value and practical significance to enhance the credibility of the judiciary. According to the relationship between the civil and administrative disputes, the case for public housing registration problems are mainly involved in cross administrative disputes involving civil disputes, civil disputes and administrative disputes in civil and administrative disputes and three the types, which are caused by many factors, both factors of modern society, the expansion of executive power, and housing It is difficult to register the public power to meet the requirements of formal examination and registration, administrative litigation and civil litigation to different cause. The cross on housing registration cases in our country with the legislative provisions, mainly embodied in the "Civil Procedure Law", "administrative procedure law" and the relevant provisions of the relevant judicial interpretations in these regulations, laws and regulations and the judicial interpretation is mixed, and there is mutual conflict between various provisions. This leads to the trial process of China's housing registration case, the people's court when dealing with cross problem of the line loss, the practice of different, including the ancestors were, after the first trial, and people together three models. According to our country's housing registration case the existence of cross problem processing problems in the construction of China's public housing registration case intersection problem resolution mechanism, should abide by justice Unified, three-dimensional protection, basic principles of procedural efficiency, choose a dual processing model, determined by the same judicial organization in the trial of building registration cases, clear basis all the main housing registration in the case to participate in litigation, the establishment of a unified housing registration case case guidance system, straighten out the housing registration case trial operation the program, to make cross housing registration cases in the one-time completely solved.

【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1;D925.3

【相似文献】