日本诉讼标的理论再认识——一种诉讼法哲学观的转向

发布时间：2018-04-14 07:27

本文选题：诉讼标的 + “相对化”研究范式　；参考：《法学论坛》2017年06期

【摘要】：在过往的诉讼标的理论研究中,大多数研究成果都使用了"体系性诉讼标的理论"作为研究范式,相关研究通常把"体系性"的研究范式默认为德国、日本等主要大陆法国家理论的通行做法。但是,当代日本法的理论和实务已经放弃了"体系性诉讼标的理论",并转而将诉讼标的问题拆解成诉的合并、诉的变更、禁止重复系属、既判力的客观范围等四个子问题,在具体的诉讼场景中分别寻求妥当的解决方案。日本民事诉讼法学的哲学观是一种重视具体场景中结果妥当性的形而下哲学观。理解这种诉讼法哲学观,不仅有助于重新认识日本诉讼标的理论,还可为理解当今的整个日本民事诉讼法学提供视角。
[Abstract]:In the past studies on the subject of litigation, most of the research results have used the theory of the subject of systematic litigation as the research paradigm, and the related studies usually adopt the paradigm of "systematization" as Germany.Japan and other major continental French theory of common practice.However, the theory and practice of contemporary Japanese law have abandoned the "theory of the subject matter of systematic litigation", and have instead disintegrated the subject matter of litigation into four sub-issues, namely, the merger of litigation, the alteration of litigation, the prohibition of repetition, and the objective scope of res judicata.In the specific litigation scenarios, respectively, to find appropriate solutions.The philosophy of Japanese civil procedure law is a kind of metaphysical philosophy, which attaches importance to the appropriateness of the result in the concrete scene.Understanding this philosophy of procedural law is not only helpful to reunderstand the theory of the subject of Japanese litigation, but also provides a perspective for the understanding of the whole Japanese civil procedural law.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学民商经济法学院;
【基金】：司法部中青年项目“新范式下的民事诉讼标的理论研究”(16SFB3026)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D931.3;DD915.2

【相似文献】