电子证据的鉴真问题:基于快播案的反思

发布时间：2018-04-15 08:24

本文选题：电子证据 + 鉴真　；参考：《中外法学》2017年01期

【摘要】：快播案中,控辩双方的争议主要围绕服务器和淫秽视频这两项关键证据的取证和保管环节展开,其核心是电子证据的鉴真问题,即这两项证据同被告人之间的联系是否是真实的。该案的审理应当适用我国自2010年始建的电子证据鉴真规则。相比于国际上通用规则而言,我国的这项规则存在着缺少"自我鉴真"和"独特特征的确认"方法、较多依靠笔录审查而知情人出庭作证较少、尚未建立证据标签制度和推定鉴真制度以及缺少鉴真不能法律后果的设定等缺陷。快播案中的电子证据鉴真问题在一定程度上乃规则缺陷使然。虽然快播案中,法庭试图通过新委托鉴定进行补强,但这一做法并不能有效地鉴真,也有悖于鉴真规则的本意。新近《两高一部电子证据规则》在电子证据的鉴真方法、法律后果等方面取得了进步,能够避免快播案的证据问题。同时,也应该认识到,该项规则仍然面临着继续改革的任务。
[Abstract]:In the fast-broadcast case, the dispute between the prosecution and the defense mainly revolves around the server and obscene video as the two key evidence-gathering and custody links, the core of which is the authentication of electronic evidence.Whether the connection between the evidence and the defendant is true.The trial of this case should be applied to the electronic evidence authentication rules established in our country since 2010.Compared with the common rules in the world, there is a lack of methods of "self-identification" and "confirmation of unique characteristics" in this rule in our country.The system of evidence label and the system of presumption of truth have not been established and the legal consequences of the absence of truth identification have not been set up.To some extent, the problem of electronic evidence identification in the broadcast case is caused by the rule defect.Although the court tried to reinforce the case by new entrustment, it could not effectively identify the truth, and it was also contrary to the original intention of the authentication rule.Recently, the rules of Electronic evidence of two High School and one High School have made progress in the methods and legal consequences of electronic evidence identification, which can avoid the evidence problem in the case of quick broadcast.At the same time, it should be recognized that the rule still faces the task of continuing reform.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：2016年国家社科基金年度项目“大数据时代电子文件的证据规则与管理法制建设研究”(项目编号:16BFX033)的研究成果
【分类号】：D925.2;D920.5

【参考文献】