鉴定意见的可靠性问题研究
发布时间:2018-04-15 12:36
本文选题:鉴定意见 + 可靠性 ; 参考:《燕山大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:现代社会已经进入知识经济时代,现代科学技术已经涉入到社会生活的各个方面,各种社会纠纷也不可避免的、越来越多的涉及到有关科学技术的专门性问题。因此,在现代诉讼中,鉴定意见在发现案件事实方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。与其他种类的证据相比较,鉴定意见更具有科学性、专业性,其被采信的可能性更高。但是,在我国,司法鉴定制度并不健全,鉴定程序启动不合理、鉴定过程不规范、鉴定意见缺乏充分有效质证等诸多因素导致鉴定意见的可靠性较低,频频受到当事人及社会的质疑。虽然陆续出台的各种法律法规不断对我国司法鉴定制度进行改进,新通过的刑诉和民诉修正案也都对我国的司法鉴定制度进行了一定程度的完善,但是,许多问题依旧没有解决,要想提高鉴定意见的可靠性还需要多个方面的进一步改进。本文分四部分,第一部分主要介绍本文的写作背景、研究意义、国内外研究现状以及作者的研究计划;第二部分对鉴定意见的可靠性进行概念的阐述;第三部分具体阐述我国鉴定意见可靠性低的表现并从鉴定意见的形成过程和质证过程两方面进一步分析鉴定意见可靠性较低的原因;最后一部分针对第三部分分析的原因提出一定的解决措施,从形成和质证两方面对鉴定意见加以完善,以期对鉴定意见可靠性的提高有所裨益。
[Abstract]:Modern society has entered the era of knowledge economy, modern science and technology has been involved in all aspects of social life, various social disputes are inevitable, more and more related to the specialized issues of science and technology.Therefore, in the modern litigation, the appraisal opinion plays a more and more important role in finding the facts of the case.Compared with other kinds of evidence, the appraisal opinion is more scientific and professional, and it is more likely to be accepted.However, in our country, the system of judicial identification is not perfect, the procedure of identification is not reasonable, the process of identification is not standardized, and the appraisal opinion is lack of sufficient and effective cross-examination, and so on, which leads to the low reliability of the appraisal opinion.Frequently questioned by the parties and society.Although various laws and regulations have been introduced one after another to continuously improve the judicial expertise system in China, the newly adopted amendments to criminal and civilian proceedings have also improved the judicial expertise system in China to a certain extent, but,Many problems remain unresolved, and further improvements are needed to improve the reliability of the opinion.This paper is divided into four parts. The first part mainly introduces the writing background, research significance, research status at home and abroad and the author's research plan, the second part describes the concept of reliability of appraisal opinion.The third part elaborates the performance of the low reliability of the appraisal opinion in China and further analyzes the reasons of the low reliability of the appraisal opinion from two aspects: the forming process of the appraisal opinion and the process of cross-examination.In the last part, the author puts forward some measures to solve the reasons of the third part, and perfect the appraisal opinions from the aspects of formation and cross-examination, in order to improve the reliability of the appraisal opinions.
【学位授予单位】:燕山大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D915.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘晓丹;;科学证据可采性规则研究[J];证据科学;2012年01期
2 左宁;;我国刑事专家辅助人制度基本问题论略[J];法学杂志;2012年12期
3 田毅平;;新刑事诉讼法鉴定制度不足与再完善[J];湖北社会科学;2013年07期
4 张阳;;鉴定意见的采信标准[J];阜阳师范学院学报(社会科学版);2014年02期
5 吴梅筠,吴家櫦;英国、德国、日本及美国的法医学体制[J];中国司法鉴定;2001年02期
6 郭华;;证明责任与强制鉴定:“精神病”的鉴定问题研究[J];中国司法鉴定;2007年03期
7 陈瑞华;;鉴定意见的审查判断问题[J];中国司法鉴定;2011年05期
8 赵杰;;《民事诉讼法》的修改给鉴定管理提出的新问题[J];中国司法鉴定;2013年01期
9 陈如超;涂舜;;中国刑事重复鉴定现象的改革——基于司法实践中50例案件的实证研究[J];中国司法鉴定;2013年02期
10 冯宗美;陈玉林;;鉴定意见审查问题探究[J];中国司法鉴定;2013年03期
,本文编号:1754137
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1754137.html