关于鉴定人出庭作证的案例分析及法律思考

发布时间：2018-04-18 14:02

本文选题：民事诉讼 + 鉴定人出庭　；参考：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：鉴定人出庭作证有别于普通证人出庭作证,有其独特的诉讼地位。2012年修改后的《民事诉讼法》明确规定了鉴定人出庭作证制度,有利于规范和约束鉴定机构和鉴定人员的鉴定行为,增强鉴定意见的权威性和公信力,对于法院高效妥善处理各类纠纷,具有重要意义。但在司法实践中,由于立法的原则性和理解的差异性,该制度的司法适用仍然存在许多问题和不足,如部分当事人滥用申请鉴定人出庭的权利人为拖延诉讼,鉴定人出庭率不高,鉴定人出庭作证范围、时间界限、费用承担等不明确导致操作不够规范,人民法院及诉讼当事人无所适从。本文通过对鉴定人出庭作证的一个典型案例进行分析,引出鉴定人出庭作证面临的司法困境,并进一步结合国内其他相关研究,从理论层面对鉴定人出庭作证制度的法理属性、诉讼地位进行分析,从现实层面对我国鉴定人出庭作证制度的建立和发展、存在的主要问题以及形成的原因进行探讨,并从立法和司法实践层面完善鉴定人出庭作证制度提出对策建议。全文共分四个部分。第一部分介绍案例基本情况,分析争议焦点,提出理论思考。第二部分论述鉴定人出庭作证的法律特征、属性、功能和价值。第三部分梳理我国民事诉讼中鉴定人出庭作证制度的演进和理解,重点归纳该制度在司法实践中暴露出的主要问题及不足,并探讨其根源及成因,指出立法缺陷和理论认识的不足。第四部分提出思考与建议,结合案例探讨鉴定人出庭作证立法的必要性及当前的立法方向,并建议在司法实践中发挥法律解释的能动性,更好地解决鉴定人出庭作证问题。
[Abstract]:Unlike ordinary witnesses, expert witnesses have their unique litigation status. The revised Civil procedure Law in 2012 clearly stipulates the system of experts appearing in court to testify.It is of great significance for the courts to deal with all kinds of disputes efficiently and properly by standardizing and restricting the appraisal behavior of appraisal institutions and personnel, enhancing the authority and credibility of appraisal opinions.However, in judicial practice, due to the differences in principle and understanding of legislation, there are still many problems and deficiencies in the judicial application of this system, such as some parties abusing the right to apply for expert to appear in court and procrastinate proceedings artificially.The rate of the expert appearing in court is not high, the scope of the expert appearing in court, the time limit, the cost bearing and so on are not clear, the operation is not standard, the people's court and the litigant are at a loss.Based on the analysis of a typical case of expert testifying in court, this paper draws out the judicial dilemma faced by expert witness in court, and further combines other relevant studies in China to analyze the legal attributes of the system of expert witness appearing in court from the theoretical level.The status of litigation is analyzed, and the establishment and development of the system, the main problems and the reasons for the formation of the system of experts appearing in court in our country are discussed from the realistic level.And from the legislative and judicial practice level to improve the system of expert testimony in court to put forward countermeasures.The full text is divided into four parts.The first part introduces the basic situation of the case, analyzes the focus of controversy, and puts forward theoretical thinking.The second part discusses the legal characteristics, attributes, functions and values of expert witnesses.The third part combs the evolution and understanding of the system of expert witness in civil litigation in our country, summarizes the main problems and shortcomings of the system in the judicial practice, and probes into its origin and cause of formation.The defects of legislation and the deficiency of theoretical understanding are pointed out.The fourth part puts forward some thoughts and suggestions, discusses the necessity and direction of legislation of expert witness in court, and suggests to give full play to the active role of legal interpretation in judicial practice so as to better solve the problem of expert testimony in court.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.13

【参考文献】