“后诉请求否定前诉裁判结果”类型的重复诉讼初探

发布时间：2018-04-19 15:06

本文选题：重复诉讼 + 既判力　；参考：《西南政法大学学报》2017年01期

【摘要】：《民诉法解释》第247条首次于规范层面确立了重复诉讼的判断标准,其中需要特别予以关注的是诉讼请求要素的反向判断路径——"后诉的诉讼请求实质上否定前诉裁判结果"要件。基于功能视角的考察,该要件旨在填补"旧实体法说"诉讼标的理论有时难以识别实质性重复诉讼的功能漏洞,能够超越传统的既判力客观范围发挥遮断后诉的效果。类型化该要件所示情形可知,除却后诉的诉讼请求直接否定前诉判决主文之类型外,后诉的诉讼请求以否定前诉先决问题认定为路径,进而实现否定前诉判决主文之目的的,也是符合第247条意旨的重复诉讼类型。
[Abstract]:For the first time, Article 247 of the interpretation of the Civil procedure Law establishes the standard of judgment of repeated litigation at the normative level.Among them, we should pay special attention to the reverse judgment path of the elements of litigation request-"the claim of the latter suit essentially negates the result of the judgment of the former action".From the perspective of function, the purpose of this article is to fill in the theory of "old substantive law", which is difficult to identify the functional loophole of substantive repeated litigation, and can surmount the traditional objective scope of res judicata to exert the effect of the action after adjudication.The classification of the case shows that, in addition to the type of the claim directly negating the main text of the judgment of the former action, the claim of the latter suit is identified as the path by which the question of negation of the pre-judgment of the former action is identified, and the purpose of the subject document of the judgment of the former suit is negated, so as to achieve the purpose of negating the subject document of the judgment.It is also the type of repeated action in accordance with the intent of Article 247.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【基金】：2014年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“审判中心视角下的刑事、民事和行政诉讼制度改革研究”(14ZDC014)
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】