我国指定居所监视居住制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-19 23:32

本文选题：指定居所 + 监视居住　；参考：《南昌大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着新的刑事诉讼法修正案的出台,对于指定居所监视居住制度作了一些更改,但理论界和司法实践中对其褒贬不一,产生了较大的争议。笔者从指定居所监视居住的发展历程入手,详细论述了指定居所监视居住的概念及其价值内涵,并通过与其他相似制度的比较归纳总结出指定居所监视居住自身独特的刑事诉讼法价值追求。随后,通过对指定居所监视居住这一制度现有法律相关规定和国外相关制度规定进行比较,总结出我国现有制度中的不足,主要体现在场所构建不合理;指定居所监视居住超羁押性倾向可能带来律师会见制度名存实亡,对犯罪嫌疑人的人身自由限制过高,相关执行主体的失位与异化等问题;此外,现行制度框架下对该制度的监管力度不足,可能带来对犯罪嫌疑人的基本权利的侵害问题。最后,笔者从总结发现的问题出发,对如何完善相关制度提出了一些可行性建议。
[Abstract]:With the introduction of the new amendment of criminal procedure law, some changes have been made to the system of designated residence surveillance residence, but there are different opinions on it in theory and judicial practice. Starting from the development of designated residence monitoring residence, the author discusses in detail the concept of designated residence monitoring residence and its value connotation. By comparing with other similar systems, the author sums up the unique pursuit of the value of criminal procedure law. Then, by comparing the existing laws and regulations of the designated residence surveillance system with those of foreign countries, the author summarizes the shortcomings of the existing system in our country, which is mainly reflected in the unreasonable construction of the place. The designated residence to monitor the sexual tendency to live in excess of custody may lead to the death of the lawyer interview system, too high restrictions on the personal freedom of the criminal suspect, and the loss of position and alienation of the relevant executive body; in addition, Insufficient supervision of this system under the current system framework may lead to infringement of the basic rights of criminal suspects. Finally, the author puts forward some feasible suggestions on how to perfect the relevant system.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】