马克思主义群众观下我国诉调对接机制研究
本文选题:诉调对接 + 马克思主义 ; 参考:《曲阜师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:诉调对接机制是我国多元化纠纷解决机制的一项重要实践成果,它在处理人民群众内部矛盾、化解纠纷方面有着充分利用社会资源、更加接近群众等优势。社会转型期,如何建立多元化的纠纷解决机制,妥善处理发展中的社会纠纷,应对人民群众对司法的特殊需求,成为当今维护最广大人民的根本利益的关键。本文从马克思主义群众观的视角研究诉调对接机制,以期为更加有效地化解人民群众面临的各类矛盾纠纷提供参考,进而实现在马克思主义群众观的指导下推进其实现新的发展。本文主要由四部分构成。第一部分为马克思主义群众观的内涵解读,该部分对马克思主义群众观的概念进行了分析,指出了群众观的实践价值和实践路径;第二部分为我国诉调对接机制现状考察,该部分对诉调对接的概念进行了界定,以山东省为例,介绍了当前发展现状和运行模式,结合当前各地诉调对接实践,从部门衔接渠道不畅、对接面窄、存在不公正隐患、调解网络不够完善、群众认知度低、缺乏立法支持和制度保障等方面总结出诉调对接机制服务群众过程中存在的困难和问题,并结合马克思主义群众观从主观角度出发对机制运行存在问题的原因进行了分析,总结出了主观方面的三个原因:执行者以人为本服务群众理念淡薄、人民群众权力主体地位认识不到位、不重视人民群众作为社会变革的决定力量;第三部分为诉调对接价值分析,该部分结合马克思主义群众观分析当前诉调对接机制的正当性和必要性;第四部分为马克思主义群众观下诉调对接机制的完善,该部分从完善立法、加强宣传、坚持调解自愿和便民利民原则、拓宽对接范围、健全相关制度、完善程序安排、完善调解员队伍等七个方面提出了完善的对策建议。
[Abstract]:The mechanism of mediation and docking is an important practical result of the diversified dispute settlement mechanism in China. It has the advantages of making full use of social resources and getting closer to the masses in dealing with the contradictions among the people and resolving disputes. In the period of social transformation, how to establish a diversified dispute resolution mechanism and properly deal with the social disputes in development should be dealt with properly. The special needs of the masses of the people have become the key to the fundamental interests of the majority of the people today. This paper studies the mechanism of mediation and docking from the perspective of Marx's view of the masses, in order to provide a reference for the more effective resolution of the contradictions and disputes that the people face, and to realize the guidance of the view of the masses of Marx. This article mainly consists of four parts. The first part is composed of four parts. The first part is the interpretation of the connotation of the mass view of the Marx doctrine. This part analyses the concept of the mass view of Marx, points out the practical value and the practice path of the mass view, and the second part is the investigation of the current situation of the mechanism of mediation and docking in China, and the part of this part of the mediation and docking of the lawsuit. The concept is defined. Taking Shandong Province as an example, the current development status and operation mode are introduced, and combined with the current practice of mediation and docking in various parts of the country, the connection channels are not smooth, the docking surface is narrow, there is an unfair hidden danger, the mediation network is not perfect, the mass awareness is low, and the legislative support and system guarantee are lacking. The difficulties and problems existing in the process of serving the masses are analyzed, and the reasons for the existing problems in the operation of the mechanism are analyzed in the light of Marx's view of the masses, and the three reasons are summed up. The third part is the decisive force of the social change; the third part is the value analysis of the mediation and docking. This part analyzes the legitimacy and necessity of the current mediation and docking mechanism combined with the view of the Marx doctrine. The fourth part is the perfection of the mechanism of the mediation and docking under the mass view of the Marx doctrine, and the part from perfecting the legislation, strengthening the propaganda and insisting on the mediation. The seven aspects of the principle of voluntariness and convenience and benefit to the people, widening the range of docking, perfecting the relevant system, perfecting the program arrangement and perfecting the contingent of mediators, have put forward perfect countermeasures and suggestions.
【学位授予单位】:曲阜师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张邦铺;;诉调对接纠纷解决机制及其完善——基于S省P县法院的实证分析[J];西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2016年01期
2 谷正;;群众路线:马克思主义群众观的中国化[J];理论导刊;2015年01期
3 李德恩;;论双向度的“诉调对接”机制及其建构[J];江西财经大学学报;2014年05期
4 马国钧;;科学把握和践行马克思主义群众观[J];思想政治教育研究;2014年04期
5 张红侠;;失调与调适:法院在诉调对接机制构建中的角色分析[J];淮北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年01期
6 潘剑锋;;民诉法修订背景下对“诉调对接”机制的思考[J];当代法学;2013年03期
7 陆而启;;简论诉调对接程序的意见共通[J];福建江夏学院学报;2013年02期
8 刘同君;储晓雷;;论“诉调对接机制”之正当性——基于江苏经验的思考[J];江苏大学学报(社会科学版);2012年04期
9 胡峧;宋昱君;;论诉调对接的法理基础与价值诉求[J];湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
10 牟成文;;马克思的群众观及其哲学变革[J];中国社会科学;2012年02期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 王韵洁;社会转型期农村纠纷处理机制研究[D];中共中央党校;2013年
2 程凯;社会转型期的纠纷解决研究[D];华南理工大学;2013年
3 彭贵才;论政府在纠纷处理中的作用及模式[D];吉林大学;2008年
,本文编号:1778577
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1778577.html