非典型强奸案的证据审查模式研究

发布时间：2018-04-20 18:15

本文选题：非典型强奸案 + 证据审查　；参考：《扬州大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近年来,有别于以往大多数强奸案件“陌生人+暴力”的犯罪模式,“熟人+非暴力”模式的非典型强奸案件所占的比例逐渐加大。非典型强奸案件的当事双方多为关系较为熟悉的朋友、同事等,案发地点多处于比较独立和私密的空间,行为人几乎没有强迫行为或者强迫的力度不大,被害人没有反抗行为或者反抗轻微、痕迹不明显,犯罪嫌疑人也常辩称性行为系被害人自愿发生,且被害人在案件调查和审理阶段的陈述常常出现反复的情况,这些新的案件情况的出现,使得非典型强奸案件的证据认定成为我国司法实践中证据审查的难题。因此,我们需要对非典型强奸案的证据审查模式予以进一步思考,这对案件事实的查明具有十分积极的意义。本文分为三个部分:第一部分着重分析目前我国司法实践中非典型强奸案件证据审查模式的不足,具体而言有以下几点,一是“相互印证”证明模式在实践适用中的不足;二是“经验法则”在实践适用中的不足;三是传闻证据大量进入庭审。同时,在非典型强奸案中,由于其特殊性,当事双方的先前陈述具有多变性,这无疑加大了证据审查的难度。第二部分通过一个具体的案例,在对非典型强奸案中证据的证据资格和证据证明力进行考察的基础之上,分析非典型强奸案中的证据认定问题。在刑事诉讼活动过程中,审查与认定证据是查明案件事实的基础和前提。因此分析非典型强奸案件中证据的“证据资格”与“证据证明力”,进而规范司法工作人员在非典型强奸案件证据审查过程中对证据采信的认识极为重要。第三部分是对我国非典型强奸案证据审查模式的进一步思考,针对我国目前非典型强奸案件证据审查模式存在的不足,提出相关改进措施。本文认为非典型强奸案的证据审查模式应以直接言词原则与对质的运用为主,辅以相关配套制度的完善。但是,由于先前陈述在非典型强奸案中具有多变性,从而导致其证明力得不到保障,所以对于先前陈述的审查也应进行相关改进。
[Abstract]:In recent years, different from most rape cases of "stranger violence", the proportion of "acquaintance non-violence" pattern of atypical rape cases is gradually increasing. Most of the parties involved in the atypical rape cases are friends and colleagues who are familiar with the relationship. Most of the places where the crime occurred are in relatively independent and private space, and the perpetrators have almost no forced acts or have little force of coercion. The victim did not act against the victim or the resistance was slight, the trace was not obvious, and the suspect often argued that the sexual act occurred voluntarily by the victim and that the victim's statements at the investigation and trial stages of the case were often repeated, The emergence of these new cases makes the evidence recognition of atypical rape cases become a difficult problem in the judicial practice of our country. Therefore, we need to further consider the model of evidence review in atypical rape cases, which has a very positive significance to the case facts. This article is divided into three parts: the first part focuses on the analysis of the lack of evidence review model of non-typical rape cases in the judicial practice of our country at present, specifically speaking, there are the following points: first, the deficiency of "mutual confirmation" proof mode in practice; The second is the deficiency of "rule of experience" in practice, and the third is that hearsay evidence enters the trial. At the same time, in atypical rape cases, because of its particularity, both parties' previous statements are variable, which undoubtedly increases the difficulty of evidence examination. The second part through a specific case, on the basis of the investigation of the evidence qualification and the evidence proof power in the atypical rape case, analyzes the evidence confirmation problem in the atypical rape case. In the course of criminal proceedings, examination and confirmation of evidence is the basis and premise of finding out the facts of a case. Therefore, it is very important to analyze the "evidence qualification" and "evidence proof power" of evidence in atypical rape cases, and to standardize the understanding of evidence acceptance by judicial staff during the examination process of evidence in atypical rape cases. The third part is to further consider the evidence review model of atypical rape cases in China, aiming at the shortcomings of the current evidence review model of atypical rape cases in China, put forward the relevant improvement measures. This paper holds that the evidence examination mode of atypical rape cases should be based on the principle of direct words and the application of confrontation, supplemented by the perfection of relevant supporting system. However, due to the variability of previous statements in atypical rape cases, the probative power is not guaranteed, so the review of previous statements should also be improved.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】