判例纂辑方法研究

发布时间：2018-04-20 22:24

本文选题：判例纂辑方法 + 案例指导制度　；参考：《法商研究》2013年01期

【摘要】：案例指导制度既可能沦为司法解释制度的附庸,也可能成为中国特色判例制度的先声,其未来系于法律共同体的行动。由于判例纂辑包括对判例和判例研究成果的编纂、搜辑和纂述,是整个法律共同体行动的奠基性工作,因此,应揭示判例纂辑方法的机理,激发法律共同体研究判例纂辑方法的使命感,整合各自为战的判例研究工作,建立起丰富、可靠而精粹的判例库及判例研究文库,提炼判例库及判例研究文库之中原生态的精华建立索引,创造法律共同体共享的知识宝库。在这一过程中,应通过学术参与博采各类著述体裁,促成判例通说及学术通说合力机制,其中总结性著作的特殊作用尤须重视。
[Abstract]:Case guidance system may become a vassal of judicial interpretation system or a forerunner of case law system with Chinese characteristics, and its future depends on the action of legal community. Since the compilation, search and compilation of jurisprudence and the results of its research are the foundation work of the action of the entire legal Community, the mechanism of the methodology for the compilation of jurisprudence should be revealed, To stimulate the sense of mission of the legal community in the compilation of jurisprudence, to integrate the work of case studies on its own, and to establish a rich, reliable and succinct database of case studies and case studies. Abstract the pristine essence of the case database and case study library to create the knowledge treasure shared by the legal community. In this process, it is necessary to adopt academic participation in all kinds of writing styles to promote the mechanism of jurisprudence and academic generality, especially the special role of summative works.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究资助项目(12YJC820095) 中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2012M520227)
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】