行政机关上下级之间层级监督行为的可诉性——崔永超诉山东省济南市人民政府不履行法定职责案评析

发布时间：2018-04-21 02:36

本文选题：行政诉讼 + 层级监督行为　；参考：《政治与法律》2017年12期

【摘要】：在通说上,行政机关上下级之间层级监督行为一直被归入行政内部行为,不具有行政诉讼的可诉性。崔永超诉山东省济南市人民政府不履行法定职责案在相当程度上可以看作是这种通说支持下的重要判例之一。在该案的裁判理由中,法院将层级监督法律关系定性为行政内部行为时,已经足以支持该案的裁判结论。然而,裁判理由论证又转向了"改变或者撤销权"与申请人的权利义务关系和诉的利益的讨论,这可被理解为法院并没有否定层级监督行为与原告崔永超之间存在某种权利义务关系。因此,在今后的类似案件中,通过参考该案,法院有可能的突破点在于,借助法解释技术,基于"申请"、"外化"两个因素,可以有条件地承认一部分层级监督行为具有可诉性。
[Abstract]:In general terms, the administrative organs between the upper and lower levels of supervision has been classified as administrative internal acts, no administrative litigation. Cui Yongchao v. Jinan City people's Government of Shandong Province does not perform its statutory duties to a certain extent can be regarded as one of the important cases supported by this general theory. Among the reasons for the case, the court can support the conclusion of the case when it characterizes the hierarchical supervision legal relationship as an internal act of administration. However, the argumentation of the reasons of the judge has turned to the discussion of the relationship between the right of change or rescission and the rights and obligations of the applicant and the interests of the suit. This can be interpreted as the court does not deny the existence of a hierarchy of supervision and the plaintiff Cui Yongchao between some kind of rights and obligations. Therefore, in similar cases in the future, by referring to the case, the possible breakthrough point of the court is that, with the aid of legal interpretation technology, based on the two factors of "application" and "externalization", it can be conditionally recognized that some of the hierarchical supervision acts are actionable.
【作者单位】：浙江大学光华法学院;
【分类号】：D920.5;D925.3

【相似文献】