在客观真实与法律真实之间——新刑事诉讼法证明标准评析

发布时间：2018-04-21 05:45

本文选题：证明标准 + 确实充分　；参考：《河南财经政法大学学报》2013年05期

【摘要】：新刑事诉讼法证明标准"事实清楚、证据确实充分"与"排除合理怀疑"并存的规定是司法实践、理论研究与制度探索共同作用下的新规定。尽管学界对新刑事诉讼法证明标准的规定有不同的解读和认知,但两者并存的规定是立法者无奈却又不乏理性的选择,其实质是不再苛求传统的"客观真实"标准,但立法者又不完全信赖司法者对"法律真实"①标准的可控性,因此在司法实践中证明标准是在两者之间。新的证明标准体现了客观标准和主观标准的结合,在证明模式上体现了印证证明与典型自由心证的结合,在证明方向上是正向证明与反向证明的结合。新标准有利于公安司法人员对于证明标准的掌握,有利于法官心证能力的培养和提升,也有利于不被强迫自证其罪原则的实现和刑讯逼供问题的消解。
[Abstract]:The standard of proof of the new criminal procedure law, "the fact is clear, the evidence is indeed sufficient" and "the elimination of reasonable doubt" co-exist is judicial practice, theoretical research and system exploration under the joint role of the new provisions. Although the academic circles have different interpretations and understandings of the standard of proof of the new criminal procedure law, but the two provisions are helpless but not lack of rational choice, the essence of which is no longer demanding the traditional standard of "objective reality". However, the legislator does not rely entirely on the controllability of the criterion of "legal truth", so in judicial practice, it is proved that the standard is between the two. The new standard of proof embodies the combination of objective standard and subjective standard, the combination of proof model and typical free heart proof, and the combination of positive proof and reverse proof in the direction of proof. The new standard is conducive to the mastery of the standard of proof by the public security judicial personnel, to the cultivation and improvement of the judge's ability to testify, to the realization of the principle of not being forced to testify against himself and to the resolution of the problem of extorting confessions by torture.
【作者单位】：河南警察学院;
【基金】：2012年度河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“新刑事诉讼法实施背景下刑事和解制度的问题与对策研究”(青年项目)的阶段性成果(项目编号:2012CFX003)
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】