行政复议对行政诉讼的影响分析

发布时间：2018-04-22 03:07

本文选题：行政救济 + 行政复议　；参考：《江苏行政学院学报》2013年05期

【摘要】：行政复议分流了部分行政争议,纠正了部分违法行政行为,但行政复议往往由于解决争议的能力有限而使纠纷继续进入诉讼,由于纠错的功能未充分实现而导致监督不到位。行政复议对行政诉讼的负面影响既有制度设计上的原因,也有来自实践层面的消极因素。要构建行政复议与行政诉讼的和谐关系,行政复议的定位就应以解决纠纷为主要目标,而将监督行政和救济权利作为次要目的;在复议决定维持原具体行政行为的情况下,就应将原机关作为被告,复议机关作为第三人;行政复议须部分地采纳言辞审理原则,在复议决定对申请人或其他人可能不利的情况下,就应当听证或开庭;还应设置行政复议委员会以作为独立的行政复议机关。
[Abstract]:Administrative reconsideration diverts some administrative disputes and corrects some illegal administrative acts, but administrative reconsideration often causes disputes to continue to enter into litigation because of the limited ability to resolve disputes, and because the function of error correction is not fully realized, the supervision is not in place. The negative influence of administrative reconsideration on administrative litigation is not only caused by system design, but also by negative factors from practice. In order to build a harmonious relationship between administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation, the orientation of administrative reconsideration should be aimed at resolving disputes, and the supervision of administrative and relief rights should be regarded as the secondary purpose. The original organ shall be regarded as the defendant and the reconsideration organ as the third person; the administrative reconsideration shall partially adopt the principle of hearing by words, and if the decision of reconsideration may be disadvantageous to the applicant or other person, it shall hear or hold a court session; An administrative review committee should also be set up to act as an independent administrative review organ.
【作者单位】：华南师范大学法学院;
【基金】：武汉大学法学院林莉红教授主持的中荷法律合作项目“中国行政诉讼制度改革的理论与实践”的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D922.1

【参考文献】