日本行政诉讼救济范围之拓展——“行政处分性”之理论解析
发布时间:2018-04-22 06:33
本文选题:行政诉讼(抗告诉讼) + 行政诉讼的受案范围 ; 参考:《行政法学研究》2017年03期
【摘要】:尽管日本在2004年修改《行政案件诉讼法》时没有对行政诉讼(抗告诉讼)的对象予以明确界定,但从修法前后最高法院的若干判例来看,却出现了行政诉讼的受案范围逐渐拓宽、国民可以以此获得司法救济的领域愈发扩展的趋势。然而,这种变化并不意味着对早期判例所确立的"基本公式"的否定。相反,它是在尊重判断定式的前提之下,通过不断尝试具体的法律构造解释才得以逐步实现的。而在这一演变过程当中,"行政处分性"理论,厥功至伟,发挥了相当大的作用。
[Abstract]:Although Japan did not clearly define the object of administrative litigation when amending the Administrative cases procedure Law in 2004, it can be seen from several cases of the Supreme Court before and after the amendment of the Law. However, the scope of accepting cases in administrative proceedings has been gradually widened, and the field of judicial relief can be increasingly expanded. However, this change does not mean a denial of the "basic formula" established by earlier jurisprudence. On the contrary, under the premise of respecting the judgment formula, it can be realized step by step by constantly trying concrete legal structure interpretation. In the course of this evolution, the theory of administrative punishment played a significant role.
【作者单位】: 日本山口大学大学院;
【分类号】:D931.3;DD915.4
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 佟连发;曾祥瑞;;日本行政诉讼中的抗告诉讼与撤销诉讼研究[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年06期
,本文编号:1786040
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1786040.html