我国死刑案件定案证据标准研究

发布时间：2018-04-22 08:25

本文选题：死刑案件 + 证据标准　；参考：《吉首大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：死刑是剥夺生命的一种处罚手段,在我国的刑事处罚手段里,是等级最高,最严厉的一种刑事处罚手段,相比其他刑事处罚手段,死刑也是最残酷的一种刑事处罚手段,所以,国际地区大部分都废除了死刑这一处罚方式。迄今为止,共有九十六个国家完成死刑程序的废除,即使部分国家仍执行这一制度,但应用条件也是很严格的,比如我国、日本、韩国,等等。就目前我国死刑罪名来说,继刑法修正案(八)减少13个死刑罪名后,刑法修正案(九)再减少9个死刑罪名,在执行少杀、慎杀、逐步减少适用死刑罪名的死刑政策时,刑法修正案(九)迈出了坚实的一步。在我国刑事处罚中,要数死刑是最严酷的刑事处罚手段,是直接执行性命夺取程序,对此很多国家已经废除这一刑罚,但仍然执行的部分国家中,也是对死刑适用有比较严格的限制,少用、慎用成了一种趋势,在历次的刑法修改,死刑罪名的不断减少,也可以看出,我国在制定保留死刑,严格适用的刑事政策。对死刑所需定案证据的标准要求进行分析,必须坚持从严执刑,且对其要严格控制,保证其要达到证据确实、充分的证明标准来证明案件事实。对死刑案件来说,直接决定被告人生死存亡的重要点就是证据问题,只有证据达到确实、充分,才能保障每个被告人的生命权,人生权。同时,死刑案件定案证据必须达到确实、充分才能有效的避免冤假错案,提高侦查机关、检察机关、审判机关对死刑案件的办案质量,换种说法,也是保障每一个被告人得到公平正义的处理、每一个司法人员阳光透明的办案。在我国,死刑案件和普通的刑事案件的证明标准是一样的,都需要每一个案件达到案件事实清楚,证据确实、充分,这样,才能通过案件的客观性来定罪量刑。在死刑案件上,对死刑案件的证明标准会控制的比较严格,侦查人员、审查起诉人员、审判员都应当在事实清楚,证据确实充分的条件下,根据定罪标准和量刑标准去进行死刑的判决,在侦查阶段、审查起诉阶段、审判阶段的证据取证、采信、审查这些过程中,严格的把握证据标准,通过证据标准来有效避免冤假错案,实现被告个人权益的法律保障。
[Abstract]:The death penalty is a means of punishment of deprivation of life. Among the means of criminal punishment in our country, it is the highest and most severe means of criminal punishment. Compared with other means of criminal punishment, the death penalty is also the most cruel means of criminal punishment, so, Most parts of the world have abolished the death penalty as a punishment. So far, a total of 96 countries have completed the abolition of the death penalty, even though some countries still implement this system, but the application conditions are very strict, such as China, Japan, South Korea, and so on. As far as death penalty charges are concerned in our country, following the reduction of 13 death penalty charges in amendment (8) of the Criminal Law, the amendment (9) to the Criminal Law reduces the number of death penalty charges by another 9. In carrying out the policy of killing less, carefully killing, and gradually reducing the death penalty for which the death penalty is applied, The Criminal Law Amendment (9) has taken a solid step forward. In our country's criminal punishment, the death penalty is the harshest means of criminal punishment, and it is the direct execution of the procedure of taking lives. Many countries have abolished this penalty, but some of them still carry out the penalty. It is also a relatively strict restriction on the application of the death penalty, less use, cautious use has become a trend, in the successive criminal law amendments, the death penalty charges continue to reduce, it can be seen that our country in the formulation of the death penalty, strict application of the criminal policy. In order to analyze the standard requirement of death penalty, we must insist on strict execution of punishment and strictly control it to ensure that it can meet the standard of proof and sufficient proof to prove the facts of the case. To the death penalty cases, the important point that decides the defendant's life or death directly is the evidence problem. Only when the evidence is true and sufficient, can every defendant's right to life and life be guaranteed. At the same time, the evidence for the determination of a death penalty case must be solid and sufficient in order to effectively avoid unjust and false cases, improve the quality of handling cases of death penalty cases by investigating organs, procuratorial organs, and judicial organs. In other words, It also ensures that every defendant is handled fairly and justly, and that every judicial officer handles the case in a sunny and transparent manner. In our country, the standard of proof of death penalty cases and ordinary criminal cases is the same, and each case needs to be clear about the facts of the case, the evidence is true and sufficient, so that we can pass the objectivity of the case to the conviction and sentencing. In death penalty cases, the standard of proof of death penalty cases will be strictly controlled. Investigators, prosecutors and judges should all be under conditions where the facts are clear and the evidence is indeed sufficient. To carry out a sentence of death according to the criteria of conviction and sentencing, to obtain evidence in the investigation stage, to examine the prosecution stage, to obtain evidence in the trial stage, to adopt credibility, and to strictly grasp the evidentiary standard during the examination of these processes, The standard of evidence is adopted to effectively avoid unjust cases and realize the legal protection of the defendant's personal rights and interests.
【学位授予单位】：吉首大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】