刑事速裁程序存在的问题及完善

发布时间：2018-04-22 12:25

本文选题：刑事速裁程序 + 试点城市　；参考：《学习与探索》2017年03期

【摘要】：2014年,全国人民代表大会常务委员会第九次会议通过《关于授权最高人民法院、最高人民检察院在部分地区开展刑事案件速裁程序试点工作的决定》,在18个城市开展刑事速裁程序试点工作。通过对山东省济南、青岛两试点城市的调研可以发现,经过一段时间的试行,刑事速裁程序运行良好,其不仅提高了轻微刑事案件的办案效率、优化了司法资源的合理配置,还保证了轻微刑事案件的量刑公正,贯彻了宽严相济、惩办与教育相结合的刑事政策。但是,该程序在试行过程中也存在公检法司四机关衔接机制不健全、被告人权利受到忽视、配套制度不完善等问题,应该加快对刑事速裁程序的立法和适用机制的完善,使这一程序发挥更大的功能和作用。
[Abstract]:In 2014, the Ninth meeting of the standing Committee of the National people's Congress adopted the draft on authorizing the Supreme people's Court, The decision of the Supreme people's Procuratorate to launch the trial work of the Criminal cases Quick adjudication procedure in some regions; and to launch the trial work of the Criminal Quick adjudication procedure in 18 cities. Through the investigation of the two pilot cities of Jinan and Qingdao in Shandong Province, we can find that after a period of trial, the criminal adjudication procedure runs well, which not only improves the efficiency of handling minor criminal cases, but also optimizes the rational allocation of judicial resources. It also ensures the justice of sentencing in minor criminal cases and implements the criminal policy of combining punishment with education. However, in the process of trial, there are still some problems, such as the imperfect connection mechanism of the four organs of the Public Prosecutions Department, the neglect of the rights of the accused, the imperfect supporting system, and so on, so we should speed up the perfection of the legislation and the applicable mechanism of the criminal adjudication procedure. Make this program play a greater function and role.
【作者单位】：山东财经大学法学院;
【基金】：山东省法学会2015年度重点课题[SLS(2015)E12-2]
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】