南宁市律师惩戒制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-23 07:37

本文选题：律师制度 + 惩戒制度　；参考：《广西大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在我国,律师队伍是在党的领导下建设社会主义法治国家一支不可或缺的重要法治力量。在全面推进依法治国的时代背景下,中央愈加重视律师行业的管理和建设。党的十八届四中全会明确提出要监督律师严格遵守职业道德和职业操守,强化准入、退出管理,严格执行违法违规执业惩戒制度。因此,新形势下研究和改进律师管理及其配套的惩戒制度显得尤为重要。律师惩戒是律师管理制度中不可或缺的重要组成部分,惩戒虽然不是管理的目的,但是管理目标的实现需要健全的惩戒制度来维持。没有惩戒手段,管理就没有威慑力,也就难以达到管理的目的。本文通过回顾我国律师惩戒制度的发展历程,在借鉴考察、分析和比较英、美、法等国家和我国台湾地区律师惩戒制度的基础上,对我国现行的律师惩戒制度进行了分析研究,认为当前的律师惩戒制度存在一些问题,比如惩戒程序不透明,惩戒机构运行不畅,惩戒程序规定缺失,惩戒职能太弱,惩戒实践运用太少,惩戒救济权利不健全等等。针对如何建立健全适合我国基本国情的律师惩戒制度,笔者认为要因地制宜,一切从我国的实际出发,不能完全照搬西方模式,不能过多强调律师行业高度自治。应该结合我国的基本国情,发挥体制优势,加强律师行业党建工作,协调各方统筹推进。坚持司法行政机关对律师惩戒的主导地位,发挥行政处罚在律师惩戒方面的职能作用。将律师不良执业信息记录披露和查询机制与国家信用体系同步建设,同步管理,有效衔接,建立健全律师执业退出机制。
[Abstract]:In our country, lawyers are an indispensable force in building a socialist country ruled by law under the leadership of the Party. Under the background of promoting the rule of law in an all-round way, the central government pays more attention to the management and construction of the law profession. The fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee clearly proposed to supervise lawyers to strictly abide by professional ethics and ethics, strengthen access, withdraw from management, and strictly enforce the disciplinary system of illegal and illegal practice. Therefore, under the new situation, it is particularly important to study and improve the lawyer management and its supporting disciplinary system. The discipline of lawyers is an indispensable part of the lawyer management system. Discipline is not the purpose of management, but the realization of management goal needs a sound disciplinary system to maintain. Without disciplinary means, management will have no deterrent, and it will be difficult to achieve the goal of management. Based on the review of the development of China's lawyer disciplinary system, and on the basis of analyzing and comparing the lawyers' disciplinary system in Britain, the United States and France, and in Taiwan, this paper makes an analysis and study of the current lawyer's disciplinary system in China. The author thinks that there are some problems in the current disciplinary system of lawyers, such as the opacity of disciplinary procedures, the unsmooth operation of disciplinary institutions, the lack of provisions of disciplinary procedures, the weak disciplinary functions, too few disciplinary practices, the imperfect right of disciplinary remedies, and so on. In view of how to establish and perfect the lawyer disciplinary system suitable for our country's basic national conditions, the author thinks that we should take measures in line with local conditions, proceed from the reality of our country, not copy the western model completely, and emphasize too much on the high degree of autonomy of the lawyer profession. We should combine the basic situation of our country, give play to the system superiority, strengthen the party building work of the lawyer profession, coordinate all parties to advance as a whole. Insist on the leading position of the judicial administrative organ to the lawyer's discipline, and give play to the function of the administrative punishment in the lawyer's discipline. The disclosing and querying mechanism of lawyers' bad practice information record and the national credit system should be constructed synchronously, managed synchronously, effectively connected, and established and perfected the lawyer's exiting mechanism.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.5

【相似文献】