依法不负刑事责任的精神病人强制医疗程序若干问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-24 04:04

本文选题：强制医疗 + 庭审模式　；参考：《法律适用》2016年12期

【摘要】：修订后的《刑事诉讼法》规定了依法不负刑事责任的精神病人强制医疗程序。本文认为,强制医疗程序应采取二元化的庭审设置,即将强制医疗庭审程序划分为两段:先查明被申请人是否实施了危害社会的行为以及是否具有刑事责任能力方面,可以按照普通刑事案件的庭审程序进行;而在查明被申请人是否有继续危害社会的可能以及是否需要强制医疗方面,可以更多的采用听证的模式。证明标准方面应采取多元标准,对被告人实施危害社会的行为以及是否系依法不负刑事责任的精神病人,应当采用与普通刑事案件同一的证明标准,即事实清楚,证据确实充分;对"有继续危害社会的可能"的判断可采优势规则,即行为人继续危害社会的可能大于不会再实施危害社会行为的可能即可。并主张多维度把握"继续危害社会的可能"。
[Abstract]:The revised Code of Criminal procedure prescribes compulsory medical procedures for mental patients who are not criminally responsible according to law. This paper holds that the compulsory medical procedure should be dualized, that is, the compulsory medical trial procedure should be divided into two sections: first, to find out whether the respondent has committed an act that endangers society and whether he has the ability to be criminally responsible. It can be conducted according to the procedure of ordinary criminal cases, and the mode of hearing can be used more in finding out whether the defendant has the possibility of continuing to endanger society and whether compulsory medical treatment is required. With regard to the standard of proof, multiple standards should be adopted, and it is clear that the same standard of proof as in ordinary criminal cases should be adopted for the mentally ill who carry out acts harmful to society and whether they are not criminally responsible in accordance with the law, that is, the facts are clear. The evidence is indeed sufficient; the rule of advantage for judging "the possibility of continuing to harm society" is that the perpetrator is more likely to continue to harm society than to no longer carry out the act of harming society. And advocates that the multi-dimensional grasp of "continue to endanger the possibility of society."
【作者单位】：上海市高级人民法院刑一庭;华东政法大学;
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】