检察机关量刑建议实务问题探讨

发布时间：2018-04-26 05:13

本文选题：量刑建议 + 质量要求　；参考：《人民检察》2013年10期

【摘要】：量刑建议具有结论上的不确定性、提出量刑建议后对检察机关和公诉人员带来的风险性、对量刑辩论和量刑结果的导向性以及对案件法庭审理和法院最后量刑结果的监督性等方面的特点,这些特点相互联系并统一于监督性上。量刑建议的质量要求体现在形式上的规范性、结论上的一致性和价值上的正义性方面。量刑建议的具体操作步骤应为:根据案件事实和性质选择法定刑幅度;采用实证分析和逻辑推演相结合的方法确定建议量刑起点即量刑基准;结合犯罪数额、次数、后果等反映全案社会危害性程度的事实确定基准刑;提取法定量刑情节和酌定量刑情节;在基准刑的基础上由量刑情节对基准刑进行调节后得出刑罚量以最终确定建议刑量。
[Abstract]:Sentencing recommendations have uncertainty in conclusion, and the risks to procuratorial organs and public prosecution personnel brought about by sentencing recommendations, The characteristics of sentencing debate and sentencing results, as well as the supervision of court cases and the final sentencing results, are interrelated and unified in supervision. The quality of sentencing recommendation is embodied in formal standardization, consistency in conclusion and justice in value. The specific operational steps of sentencing recommendations should be: to select the legal range of punishment according to the facts and nature of the case; to adopt the method of combining empirical analysis and logical deduction to determine the starting point of sentencing, that is, the benchmark of sentencing; to combine the amount of crime, the number of times, The consequences reflect the degree of social harmfulness of the case to determine the facts of the benchmark penalty; extract the statutory circumstances of sentencing and discretionary circumstances of sentencing; on the basis of the standard punishment by sentencing circumstances to adjust the standard punishment to arrive at the amount of punishment to determine the recommended amount of punishment.
【作者单位】：江西省丰城市人民检察院;
【分类号】：D926.3

【参考文献】