G市实施未成年人轻罪记录消除制度问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-26 08:13

本文选题：未成年人 + 轻罪记录消除　；参考：《贵州民族大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：《刑事诉讼法》修改后,明确规定了针对未成年犯罪人的轻罪记录封存制度。该制度在设计之初就备受关注,修正的《刑事诉讼法》正式实施后无论在刑法理论界学者还是司法实践部门,未成年人轻罪记录封存或者消除都是较为热议的话题之一。该制度正如一把“双刃剑”,人们在感概该制度具有重大现实意义和理论价值的同时,也担忧会与早已立法成熟的其他国家产生不同的问题。G市作为G省的省会城市,在近几年的司法实践中加紧对该制度的落实,取得了可喜的成绩,但也存在诸多问题,譬如:涉及未成年犯罪人案卷文书形式封存方面,法院、检察机关和公安机关等部门能够较好地落实国家相关法律规定,设立了独立的案卷文书封存柜,非法定程序不得由第三方单位或者个人查询,但涉及实质封存时,公安机关则需要给予更多的程序上的配合和技术上的支持,等等。综合调研情况和搜集的文献资料,G市在贯彻落实该制度时主要存在三大问题:一是制度内在规定不够具体,规定的比较宽泛,不够细致,在实践中缺乏必要的操作性。尤其是涉及轻罪记录消除决定权的适用主体、决定权的适用对象、消除制度适用的具体程序、消除后的法律效果等等问题均未具体化;二是该制度外部运行环境受阻较多,不仅与我国一些相关法律法规相冲突,而且缺乏保障其有效运行的配套制度;三是有关部门及人员对该制度重视程度不够,客观上阻碍了该制度的顺利运行和相关工作的开展。本文共分为三部分。第一部分旨在研究未成年人轻罪记录消除制度的基础问题,包括概念界定以及理论基础分析等内容,旨在归纳出国内外对此问题的研究现状,并对域外有关该制度进行基本的概括1,明确研究的范围,在此基础上提出自己的观点;第二部分是从目前G市相关工作中存在的主要问题以及存在的不足之处进行剖析;第三部分是在总结域外经验并结合G市工作基础上,提出完善该制度的一些设想。
[Abstract]:After the revision of the Code of Criminal procedure, the system of sealing and storing minor crimes against minor offenders is clearly stipulated. The system has attracted much attention since the beginning of its design. After the revised Code of Criminal procedure has been formally implemented, whether in the criminal law theorists or judicial practice departments, the closure or elimination of minor misdemeanor records is one of the hot topics. This system is like a "double-edged sword". While people feel that the system has great practical significance and theoretical value, they also worry that the city of G. will have a different problem from other countries that have long had mature legislation. In recent years, we have stepped up the implementation of this system in judicial practice, and achieved gratifying results. However, there are still many problems, such as: concerning the form of file sealing of juvenile offenders, the court, Procuratorial organs, public security organs and other departments have been able to implement the relevant laws and regulations of the state, and have set up independent file file storage cabinets. Non-statutory procedures may not be queried by third party units or individuals, but when it comes to substantive sealing, Public security organs need to give more procedural cooperation and technical support, and so on. There are three main problems in the implementation of the system: first, the system is not specific enough, the stipulation is broad and detailed, and it lacks the necessary operation in practice. In particular, the applicable subject, object of decision, the specific procedure of the application of the elimination system, the legal effect after the elimination of the misdemeanor record, and so on, are not materialized, the second is that the external operating environment of the system is more obstructed. It not only conflicts with some relevant laws and regulations of our country, but also lacks the supporting system to guarantee its effective operation. Third, the relevant departments and personnel pay less attention to the system, which objectively hinders the smooth operation of the system and the development of related work. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part aims to study the basic issues of the system of eliminating minor misdemeanours, including the definition of concepts and theoretical basis analysis, in order to sum up the current research situation of this problem at home and abroad. In the second part, the author analyzes the main problems and shortcomings in the related work of G City. 1. The author makes a basic summary of the system in foreign countries and makes a clear definition of the scope of the study, and puts forward his own viewpoints on the basis of the above conclusions. The second part is to analyze the main problems and shortcomings in the relevant work of G City. The third part is based on summing up the overseas experience and combining G city work, puts forward some ideas to perfect this system.
【学位授予单位】：贵州民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】