中国境遇下羁押必要性审查的难题及其破解——以羁押必要性审查配套制度的构建为中心
发布时间:2018-04-27 07:36
本文选题:羁押必要性 + 取保候审 ; 参考:《政治与法律》2013年04期
【摘要】:羁押不节制在我国屡受诟病,差强人意的治理效果暴露出羁押必要性证明难、替代性强制措施不足等深层次机制瓶颈。新设的羁押必要性审查制度要发挥预期功能,在科学的程序构架之外,还要注重配套机制建设。未来应完善羁押必要性证明机制和取保候审保障机制,通过明确羁押必要性证明标准、证明责任以及创新取保候审监管方式等措施,来化解必要性难以证明、替代性强制措施不足等难题。
[Abstract]:Detention without restraint in our country has been repeatedly criticized, poor governance results exposed the necessity of custody is difficult to prove, alternative coercive measures and other deep-seated mechanism bottlenecks. The new system of examining the necessity of custody should play the expected function and pay attention to the construction of supporting mechanism in addition to the scientific procedural framework. In the future, we should perfect the mechanism of proof of necessity of custody and guarantee mechanism of obtaining bail pending trial. It is difficult to prove the necessity by making clear the standard of proof of necessity of custody, the responsibility of proof and the innovation of supervision mode of obtaining bail pending trial. Lack of alternative coercive measures and other difficult problems.
【作者单位】: 上海市人民检察院第二分院;
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 董启海;张庆凤;;对外来人员适用取保候审之探索[J];国家检察官学院学报;2008年03期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 陈俊敏;;非本地居民犯罪强制措施高羁押率之反思[J];铁道警官高等专科学校学报;2010年01期
2 高通;;论无罪判决及其消解程序——基于无罪判决率低的实证分析[J];法制与社会发展;2013年04期
3 王,
本文编号:1809846
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1809846.html