当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

论逮捕权的滥用及其规制

发布时间:2018-04-27 13:56

  本文选题:逮捕权 + 滥用 ; 参考:《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:我国法律中规定的逮捕是对犯罪嫌疑人、被告人在法院作出生效裁判之前予以关押的一种暂时剥夺其人身自由的强制措施,这一强制措施是所有强制措施中最为严厉的,严重影响着公民基本权利——人身自由权的行使,但由于我国的逮捕制度是强制到案行为与羁押行为的合一,而羁押必要性审查主要是针对逮捕进行的事后审查,且仍是由检察机关主导,故仍存在一定现实的问题,造成逮捕强制措施在一定程度上的滥用,对公民的合法权益造成了一定的侵害。逮捕措施的规制和完善仍具有紧迫性和现实性。对司法实践过程存在的逮捕权滥用的情况进行了分析研究,从司法实践角度入手,通过一些案例说明司法实务中逮捕权滥用的状况,针对逮捕权滥用的现状,找出产生逮捕权滥用的问题的根源,对我国逮捕权在立法上设置存在的缺陷进行分析,最后结合司法实践以及外国法中先进的经验做法,围绕如何完善我国现有的逮捕制度,如何规制逮捕权等这些问题提出相应的建议,为现行科学良性逮捕制度的构建提供一些参考,并且希望围绕逮捕措施的慎用,国家尽快出台一些法律,从制度上为逮捕权的规制提供一些立法支持,进一步促进我国人权事业的发展。
[Abstract]:The arrest provided for in the law of our country is a kind of coercive measure of temporarily depriving a criminal suspect of his or her personal liberty pending the effective decision of the court. This coercive measure is the most severe of all coercive measures. It seriously affects the exercise of the citizen's basic right to personal freedom. However, the arrest system in our country is a combination of compulsory case behavior and detention behavior, and the examination of the necessity of custody is mainly an ex post examination of arrest. And is still dominated by the procuratorial organs, so there are still some practical problems, resulting in the abuse of compulsory measures of arrest to a certain extent, causing certain violations of the legitimate rights and interests of citizens. The regulation and perfection of arrest measures are still urgent and realistic. This paper analyzes and studies the situation of the abuse of the power of arrest in the course of judicial practice, from the angle of judicial practice, explains the situation of the abuse of the power of arrest in the judicial practice through some cases, and aims at the situation of the abuse of the power of arrest. To find out the root of the problem of the abuse of the power of arrest, to analyze the defects in the legislation of the power of arrest in our country. Finally, combining with the judicial practice and advanced experience and practice in foreign law, the author focuses on how to perfect the existing arrest system of our country. Some suggestions on how to regulate arrest power are put forward in order to provide some references for the construction of the current scientific and benign arrest system, and it is hoped that the state will issue some laws as soon as possible, focusing on the cautious use of arrest measures. The system provides some legislative support for the regulation of arrest power, and further promotes the development of human rights in China.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘国媛;;刑事检察听证制度的“理”与“法”[J];法学评论;2015年01期

2 郭晶;;逮捕之实体化模式及其危害[J];赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版);2012年10期

3 易延友;;刑事强制措施体系及其完善[J];法学研究;2012年03期

4 彭志刚;;论审查逮捕制度的分流听证式改造[J];中国刑事法杂志;2012年01期

5 李钟;刘浪;;监视居住制度评析——以2011年《刑事诉讼法修正案(草案)》为视角[J];法学杂志;2012年01期

6 万春;;减少审前羁押的若干思考[J];河南社会科学;2011年03期

7 但伟;;试析羁押必要性审查与看守所检察[J];人民检察;2010年24期

8 姚红秋;韩新华;;审查起诉环节继续羁押必要性审查机制的构建[J];中国检察官;2010年11期

9 杜宇;;“刑事和解”:批评意见与初步回应[J];中国刑事法杂志;2009年08期

10 杨雄;;刑事强制措施实体化倾向之反思——以预防性羁押为范例[J];政法论坛;2008年04期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 樊崇义 ;张书铭;;细化逮捕条件,完善逮捕程序[N];检察日报;2012年



本文编号:1811008

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1811008.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户79485***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com