我国刑事证明标准的理解与适用

发布时间：2018-04-29 12:17

本文选题：刑事证明标准 + 排除合理怀疑　；参考：《法律适用》2014年03期

【摘要】：刑事证明标准是指认定犯罪嫌疑人、被告人犯罪所要达到的程度。我国新刑事诉讼法对"证据确实、充分"的定罪证明标准作了细化,引入了英美法系国家"排除合理怀疑"的表述,体现出刑事证明标准由客观向主客观相结合的发展动向。中国语境下的"排除合理怀疑"是从主观方面为"证据确实、充分"提供判断依据,使之更具可操作性。在司法实践中正确适用刑事证明标准,应当注意:"排除合理怀疑"不应孤立适用,而是与其他条件紧密联系形成统一整体;严格适用刑事证明标准,不得对案件事实的认定降低要求;坚持疑罪从无原则,摒弃"留有余地"的判决方式,对事实不清、证据不足,没有达到证明标准而难以决断的案件,应依法作出证据不足、指控的犯罪不能成立的无罪判决。
[Abstract]:The standard of criminal proof refers to the degree to which the criminal suspect and the defendant commit a crime. The new criminal procedure law of our country refines the standard of conviction proof of "evidence is true and sufficient", and introduces the expression of "beyond reasonable doubt" in Anglo-American law system countries, which reflects the development trend of the standard of criminal proof from objective to subjective and objective. In Chinese context, "beyond reasonable doubt" provides a basis for judging "evidence is true and sufficient" from the subjective aspect, making it more operable. In applying the standard of criminal proof correctly in judicial practice, attention should be paid to: "eliminating reasonable doubt" should not be applied in isolation, but should be closely linked with other conditions to form a unified whole, and the standard of criminal proof should be strictly applied. No requirement shall be lowered for the determination of the facts of the case; cases in which the determination of the facts is not clear, the evidence is insufficient, and it is difficult to make a decision without meeting the standard of proof shall be insufficient in accordance with the law. An acquittal for the crime of which the charge cannot be established.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学;
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】