被害人在刑事诉讼中的权利保障探究
发布时间:2018-04-29 13:54
本文选题:刑事被害人 + 诉讼权利保障 ; 参考:《山东大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:我国自1996年就在刑事诉讼法赋予了刑事被害人以当事人的法律地位,并规定了一系列诉讼权利,2012年新修订的刑事诉讼法及相关司法解释也保留了这些规定,并作出了一些修改。但总体看来,被害人所享有的诉讼权利不仅与同为诉讼当事方的被告人相比显得薄弱,而且与其当事人的法律地位并不匹配。我国被害人权利保障水平相比于西方法律发达国家更有较大差距,尚存诸多不足之处,须加以完善。造成该种状况的原因是多方面的。本文拟采用历史分析和比较分析的方法,从刑事被害人诉讼权利保障的基本理论的入手,然后在对世界上主要国家刑事被害人诉讼权利保障状况进行比较研究的基础上,找出我国刑事诉讼法在被害人诉讼权利保障方面的不足,提出完善我国刑事诉讼中被害人权利保障制度的立法构想。全文由引言、正文和结论三大部分组成。 正文共分四部分。 第一部分为刑事被害人诉讼权利保障的概述。该部分首先从被害人概念的界定、被害人诉讼地位的历史发展着手,引申出被害人诉讼权利保障问题,然后从人权保障、程序公正、诉讼平等等角度对被害人权利保障的必要性进行探究,同时阐明加强被害人诉讼权利保障的意义。 第二部分是国外刑事被害人诉讼权利的考察。该部分选取各诉讼模式中具有代表意义的国家,对其被害人诉讼地位及权利保障状况进行介绍找出其中存在的差异,挖掘出其中共通性的因素,意图为我国刑事诉讼中被害人权利保障机制的完善提供借鉴。 第三部分为我国刑事被害人诉讼权利保障的现状与不足。该部分基于我国现行刑事诉讼法的具体规定,通过新旧刑事诉讼法和司法解释的对比展现我国在刑事被害人权利保障上所发生的改变,描述我国刑事被害人权利保障的现状及不足。 第四部分为刑事被害人诉讼权利保障的完善构想。该部分首先从宏观上提出我国刑事被害人权利保障机制完善的总体思路,进而提出具体的完善措施和制度建构方案。
[Abstract]:Since 1996, our country has given the criminal victim the legal status of the party and a series of procedural rights in the criminal procedure law. The newly revised criminal procedure law and the related judicial interpretation in 2012 have also retained these provisions and made some amendments. But generally speaking, the legal rights enjoyed by the victims are not only weak compared with the defendants who are both litigant parties, but also do not match the legal status of the parties concerned. Compared with the western developed countries, the level of protection of victims' rights in our country has a big gap, and there are still many shortcomings, which should be perfected. There are many reasons for this situation. This paper intends to use the methods of historical analysis and comparative analysis, starting with the basic theory of the protection of criminal victims' procedural rights, and then on the basis of comparative research on the situation of the protection of criminal victims' procedural rights in major countries in the world. To find out the deficiency of our country's criminal procedure law in the protection of the victim's right of action, and to put forward the legislative conception of perfecting the system of protecting the victim's right in our criminal procedure. The full text consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four parts. The first part is the summary of the protection of criminal victim's right of action. This part begins with the definition of the concept of the victim, the historical development of the victim's litigation status, and then extends the protection of the victim's procedural rights, and then from the human rights protection, the procedural justice, This paper probes into the necessity of the protection of the victim's rights from the angle of procedural equality, and expounds the significance of strengthening the protection of the victim's right of action. The second part is the investigation of foreign criminal victim's litigation right. In this part, the author selects the representative countries in each litigation mode, introduces the status of the victim litigation and the protection of their rights, finds out the differences, and excavates the common factors among them. It is intended to provide reference for the perfection of victim rights protection mechanism in criminal procedure in our country. The third part is the current situation and deficiency of the protection of criminal victim's right of action. This part is based on the specific provisions of our current criminal procedure law, through the comparison of the new and the old criminal procedure law and judicial interpretation to show the changes in the protection of the rights of criminal victims in our country. This paper describes the current situation and shortcomings of the protection of the rights of criminal victims in China. The fourth part is the perfect conception of the protection of criminal victim's right of action. This part firstly puts forward the overall idea of perfecting the mechanism of protecting the rights of criminal victims in our country from the macroscopic view, and then puts forward the concrete consummation measures and the scheme of system construction.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李军;论刑事案件被害人精神损害赔偿[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2004年04期
2 李满成,刘洪华;公诉案件被害人权利救济的理论探索[J];南华大学学报(社会科学版);2005年02期
3 高新华,徐新;公诉案件中被害人地位评析[J];南京师大学报(社会科学版);1999年01期
4 董士昙;犯罪被害人权利保护的理论与实践[J];法学论坛;2005年02期
5 曲伶俐;刑事附带精神损害赔偿诉讼探讨[J];山东社会科学;2002年04期
6 汪习根,陈焱光;论知情权[J];法制与社会发展;2003年02期
7 刘凌梅;西方国家刑事和解理论与实践介评[J];现代法学;2001年01期
8 刘梅湘;;刑事被害人的知情权探析[J];现代法学;2006年04期
9 左卫民,谢佑平;同步与差距:从国际标准的角度看我国刑事诉讼制度[J];政法学刊;1997年01期
10 吴卫军;;刑事诉讼中的自诉担当[J];国家检察官学院学报;2007年04期
,本文编号:1820212
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1820212.html