巡回法庭制度能否去司法地方化问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-30 07:40

  本文选题：巡回法庭 + 司法地方化　； 参考：《南京大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：最高院巡回法庭制度的建设是本轮司法改革的一大举措,其本身具有方便当事人诉讼、均衡案件负担等职能。其中,其是否具有去司法地方化的职能有待商榷。本文结合司法去地方化的相关理论并在定位最高院巡回法庭制度的基础上,从本轮司法改革整体性规范化思路的视角下来对这一问题进行分析,以期得出一个明确的结论。同时,经由对此问题的分析,对我国进行的司法改革进行相应的反思,以期使之更好地开展与推进。本文包括以下五个部分:第一部分提出问题,通过对法学学术界和实务界观点的阐述,引入本文的主要讨论问题,即我国现行的最高院巡回法庭制度能否有效地去除司法地方化问题。此外,本部分对司法去地方化的相关理论进行了阐述与分析。第二部分具体对我国的最高院巡回法庭制度进行分析,一方面,通过比较法的方法和实践指向的维度对最高院巡回法庭制度的性质进行了解读。另一方面,从外部和内部两个视角对最高院巡回法庭在我国法院系统乃至整个司法系统中的定位进行了阐述。第三部分是本文的核心部分。一方面,该部分从本轮司法改革的规范化司法改革思路的逻辑下对最高院巡回法庭制度能否去除司法地方化问题进行了分析。另一方面,对其能否"独力"去除司法地方化问题进行了分析。第四部分是对本文问题分析之后进行的相关反思,主要涉及跨行政区划法院改革、司法改革中的"合宪性"问题和司法改革方法的不足与完善三个方面。第五部分对全文进行了相应的总结。
[Abstract]:The construction of the circuit court system of the Supreme Court is a major measure of judicial reform, which has the functions of facilitating litigants' litigation and balancing the burden of cases. Among them, whether it has the function of judicial localization is open to question. Based on the theory of judicial delocalization and on the basis of locating the circuit court system of the highest court, this paper analyzes this problem from the perspective of the holistic and standardized thinking of judicial reform in this round, in order to reach a clear conclusion. At the same time, through the analysis of this problem, the author rethinks the judicial reform in our country in order to carry out and promote it better. This article includes the following five parts: the first part raises the question, through the elaboration to the legal academic circles and the practical circle viewpoint, introduces the main discussion question of this article, That is, whether the current circuit court system of the Supreme Court can effectively remove the problem of judicial localization. In addition, this part expounds and analyzes the relevant theories of judicial delocalization. The second part analyzes the system of the highest court circuit court in China. On the one hand, it interprets the nature of the highest court circuit court system through the method and practice of comparative law. On the other hand, it expounds the position of the Supreme Court Circuit Court in our country's court system and even the whole judicial system from the external and internal perspectives. The third part is the core part of this paper. On the one hand, from the logic of standardized judicial reform in this round of judicial reform, this part analyzes whether the circuit court system of the highest court can remove the judicial localization. On the other hand, it analyzes whether it can remove judicial localization alone. The fourth part is the related reflection after the analysis of this paper, which mainly involves three aspects: the reform of cross-administrative district courts, the "constitutionality" in judicial reform and the deficiency and perfection of judicial reform methods. The fifth part has carried on the corresponding summary to the full text.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.2
，

本文编号：1823672