滥用行政诉权之法律规制

发布时间：2018-04-30 23:11

本文选题：行政诉讼 + 滥用诉权　；参考：《政法论坛》2017年04期

【摘要】：行政诉讼中的滥用诉权分为滥用起诉权和滥用具体程序权利两种形态,前者表现为同时申请多种行政救济、针对不可诉的同类行为多次起诉、针对已决案件多次起诉、针对同一机关的不同行为和其他机关的类似行为纠缠诉讼;后者表现为滥用申请回避权和怠于行使具体的程序权利。滥用诉权的行为包括四个构成要件:行为人是行政诉讼的当事人,主观上存在过错,客观上实施了程序滥用的行为,造成妨碍正常诉讼秩序并给他人带来负担的结果。滥用诉权的行为因违反诚实信用原则、一事不再理原则、行政诉讼的立法目的和行政诉讼的起诉条件而违法。规制滥用诉权的行为,在遵守审慎原则的前提下,应准确把握起诉条件的适法性审查;对于"滥用起诉权"的行为,应驳回起诉或驳回诉讼请求;对"滥用具体程序权利"的行为应扩大妨碍行政诉讼强制措施的适用范围;并由过错方承担对方当事人的诉讼成本。
[Abstract]:The abuse of the right of action in administrative litigation can be divided into two forms: abuse of the right of action and abuse of specific procedural rights. The former manifests itself in applying for a variety of administrative remedies at the same time. Entanglement litigation against different acts of the same organ and similar acts of other organs; the latter shows abuse of the right of withdrawal and inactivity in exercising specific procedural rights. The behavior of abusing the right of action includes four constitutive elements: the actor is the party of administrative litigation, subjective fault exists, and the act of procedure abuse is carried out objectively, which results in obstructing the normal litigation order and bringing burden to others. The action of abusing the right of action is illegal because it violates the principle of good faith, the principle of non bis in idem, the legislative purpose of administrative litigation and the condition of litigation. To regulate the abuse of the right of action, under the premise of the principle of prudence, we should accurately grasp the proper legal examination of the conditions for prosecution, and for the act of "abusing the right of action", we should reject the suit or the request for action. To the behavior of "abusing specific procedural rights", the scope of application of compulsory measures of hindering administrative litigation should be enlarged, and the party at fault should bear the litigation cost of the other party.
【作者单位】：华南师范大学法学院;
【基金】：作者主持的国家社科基金一般项目“政府信息公开的豁免理由研究”(14BFX149)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.3

【相似文献】