案件事实认定的新思维:从诉讼证据到定案根据

发布时间：2018-05-01 07:09

本文选题：定案根据 + 证据　；参考：《甘肃社会科学》2017年03期

【摘要】：证据证明只是案件事实认定的一种方式,对证据裁判的片面坚持使刑事司法陷入了一些困境。要走出困境,就需要认识到刑事诉讼程序是一个案件事实的探知、认定过程,要承认证据不是定案的唯一根据。定案根据除了证据,还包括司法认知、预决事实、推定事实。司法解释中的定案根据条款强调反向禁止,缺乏正向引导,使得相关条款成为规避性指南,而非操作性标准。为此,应当规范相关表述,厘清案件材料、证据材料、证据和定案根据的逻辑关系,从而使证据运用更加规范,案件事实认定更加准确。
[Abstract]:Proof of evidence is only a way to identify the facts of a case, and the unilateral insistence on the judgment of evidence makes the criminal justice fall into some difficulties. To get out of the dilemma, we need to recognize that the criminal procedure is the process of discovering the facts of a case and recognizing that the evidence is not the only basis of the decision. In addition to evidence, the final decision includes judicial notice, pre-determined facts, and presumptive facts. The decision of judicial interpretation emphasizes the reverse prohibition according to the articles and lacks positive guidance, which makes the relevant articles become circumvention guidelines rather than operational standards. Therefore, it is necessary to standardize the relevant statements, clarify the logical relationship between the case materials, evidence materials, evidence and the decision basis, so that the use of evidence is more standardized, and the facts of the case are more accurate.
【作者单位】：四川大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“审判中心主义改革进程中检察权同步司法化研究”(15BFX062)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】