论羁押必要性审查制度的构建

发布时间：2018-05-02 03:17

本文选题：羁押必要性 + 审查　；参考：《吉林大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：2012年，我国《刑事诉讼法》经历了第二次修正，首次以立法的形式确立了检察机关对羁押必要性进行审查的制度。该制度改变了我国原有羁押制度附庸化、碎片化的状态，，是我国审前监督程序改革中的重要一步，也是本次修改的亮点之一。它对于解决司法实践中“一捕了之、以捕代侦、一押到底、捕后怠侦”等问题具有重要意义。羁押必要性审查制度是新修正的刑事诉讼法赋予检察机关的一项新职责，通过探讨该制度的确立意义及立法理由，发现破解我国长期以来的轻刑化高羁押率难题的途径。同时，通过借鉴国外羁押救济制度中的保释制度、定期审查制度以及人身保护令相关措施，结合我国多地的羁押必要性审查试点模式、经验，以此构建适应我国特殊国情的羁押必要性审查制度。从优化检察监督内部职能工作机制的角度出发，监所检察部门是履行羁押必要性审查职责的适格主体。同时，根据审查内容是轻罪、重罪还是违法羁押、羁押必要等的不同，构建不同的审查方式，如依申请启动的听证审查、依职权启动的定期书面审查等，既可以节约刑事诉讼制度改革的成本，又能够实现羁押必要性审查制度监督和救济的职能。羁押必要性审查制度的顺利开展不仅要立足于完善的程序设计，更要依赖于权利告知制度、沟通协作机制、跟踪回访机制、强制措施动态变更监督机制等一系列制度的配合。除上述正面激励以外，还要建立对违法行为的责任追究机制，以保证羁押必要性审查制度能够真正的发挥作用。
[Abstract]:In 2012, China's Criminal procedure Law underwent a second revision, and for the first time, the procuratorial organ established the system of examining the necessity of custody by way of legislation. This system has changed the status of subordination and fragmentation of the original detention system in our country. It is an important step in the reform of the pretrial supervision procedure in our country, and it is also one of the highlights of this revision. It is of great significance to solve the problems in judicial practice such as "one arrest, one arrest substitute investigation, one remand after arrest" and so on. The system of examining the necessity of custody is a new duty entrusted to the procuratorial organ by the newly amended Criminal procedure Law. By discussing the significance of the system and the legislative reasons, the author finds out the way to solve the problem of light punishment and high detention rate for a long time in our country. At the same time, through drawing lessons from the bail system of foreign custody relief system, periodic review system and relevant measures of habeas corpus, combined with the necessity of detention in many places in China to examine the pilot model, experience, So as to construct the system of examining the necessity of detaining according to the special situation of our country. From the angle of optimizing the working mechanism of the internal function of procuratorial supervision, the procuratorial department of the prison is the appropriate subject to perform the duty of examining the necessity of detention. At the same time, according to the differences in whether the contents of the examination are misdemeanours, felony or illegal detention, and the necessity of detaining, different ways of examination should be constructed, such as the hearing review initiated in accordance with the application, the periodic written review initiated ex officio, and so on. It can not only save the cost of the reform of the criminal procedure system, but also realize the function of supervision and relief of the necessity examination system of custody. The smooth development of the detention necessity examination system should not only be based on the perfect procedure design, but also rely on the cooperation of a series of systems, such as the right informing system, the communication and cooperation mechanism, the follow-up and return visit mechanism, the dynamic change of the supervision mechanism of the compulsory measures, and so on. In addition to the above positive incentives, we should also establish the accountability mechanism to ensure that the necessity of detention review system can really play a role.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】