刑事案件速裁程序试点运行现状实证分析——以T市八家试点法院为研究样本

发布时间：2018-05-02 04:21

本文选题：速裁程序 + 辩诉协商　；参考：《法律适用》2015年12期

【摘要】：目前,速裁程序试点工作在各地已经全面推开,试点中速裁程序适用体现出审判时限和开庭时限大幅缩短、程序启动由检察机关主导、整体适用率不高、庭审功能弱化等特点。速裁程序在试点过程中暴露出四大制度设计缺陷:功能定位模糊、审前程序繁琐、量刑激励功能发挥不力、宣告刑标准有"未审先定"嫌疑。对此,应当采取以下解决措施:一是明确速裁程序制度定位:以辩诉协商为核心、以提高效率为目标的独立诉讼程序;二是科学设置适用条件,逐步扩大适用范围;三是抓住证明标准与审前程序两个关键环节,实现速裁程序"提速";四是强化量刑激励功能,推动建立符合我国实际的辩诉协商程序;五是争取在试点期满后实现速裁程序一审终审制的立法突破。
[Abstract]:At present, the trial work of quick adjudication procedure has been pushed all over the place, the trial time limit and court session time limit have been greatly shortened, the procedure is led by procuratorial organs, the overall application rate is not high, the trial function is weakened and so on. In the process of the trial, the quick adjudication procedure exposed four major system design defects: vague function orientation, cumbersome pretrial procedure, weak function of sentencing incentive, and the suspicion of "not determining the penalty standard before trial". To solve this problem, the following measures should be taken: first, to define the orientation of the system of quick adjudication: to establish independent litigation procedure with the core of plea bargaining and the goal of improving efficiency; second, to set up the applicable conditions scientifically and to expand the scope of application step by step; Third, to grasp the two key links of proof standard and pretrial procedure, to realize the speedier adjudication procedure, to strengthen the incentive function of sentencing, and to promote the establishment of plea bargaining procedure in accordance with the reality of our country. Fifth, strive to realize the legislative breakthrough of the first instance final instance system after the expiration of the pilot program.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;天津市高级人民法院;
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】