我国技术侦查法律规制研究

发布时间：2018-05-02 08:00

本文选题：技术侦查 + 法律规制　；参考：《吉林财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：技术侦查作为一种新型侦查手段,因其效率高、专业化程度强在我国司法实践中得以普遍适用,2012年新修订的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》(以下简称《刑事诉讼法》)对技术侦查措施进行了规定,以规范了侦查人员的技术侦查行为。然而司法实务中侦查人员滥用技术侦查措施的现象时有发生,既不利于发挥其应有的作用,也会侵犯被追诉人的权利。基于此,本文拟对我国技术侦查的基本问题进行介绍,阐述其运行现状并揭示其中不足之处,通过借鉴英美法系和大陆法系国家关于技术侦查的成功经验,提出完善我国技术侦查法律规制的具体措施,更好的构建我国关于技术侦查的法律制度。全文主要分为五部分,第一部分是全文的引言部分,介绍文章的研究背景及其意义,研究方法以及文章的框架。第二部分介绍了技术侦查的基本概念以及技术侦查法律规制的概念,通过人权保障、程序法定、权力制约三个原则阐述对技术侦查进行法律规制的理论依据。第三部分阐述了我国技术侦查的立法现状,从适用范围不明确、批准主体不合理、执行程序不规范以及缺乏有效的权利救济机制四个方面分析技术侦查立法情况的不足之处。第四部分介绍了英美法系、大陆法系主要法治国家技术侦查的立法现状,通过总结比较主要法治国家的立法情况,得出更好的构建技术侦查法律规制的相关启示。第五部分阐述完善技术侦查法律规制的途径,针对第三部分提出的不足之处,从适用范围、批准主体、执行程序、相关权利救济机制四个方面来完善我国技术侦查法律规制,确保侦查环节的有效进行。
[Abstract]:As a new investigative technique, technical investigation has high efficiency. The strong degree of specialization can be widely applied in the judicial practice of our country. The newly revised Criminal procedure Law of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "Criminal procedure Law") provides for technical investigation measures in 2012. In order to standardize the technical investigation behavior of investigators. However, the phenomenon of investigators abusing technical investigative measures in judicial practice occurs from time to time, which is not conducive to the exertion of their due role, but also infringes on the rights of the accused. Based on this, this paper will introduce the basic problems of technical investigation in our country, expound the current situation of its operation and reveal its inadequacies, and learn from the successful experience of the countries of Anglo-American law system and civil law system on the technical investigation. This paper puts forward some concrete measures to perfect the legal regulation of technical investigation in our country and better construct the legal system of technical investigation in our country. The paper is divided into five parts. The first part is the introduction of the article, introducing the research background and significance, research methods and the framework of the article. The second part introduces the basic concept of technical investigation and the concept of legal regulation of technical investigation, and expounds the theoretical basis of legal regulation of technical investigation through the three principles of human rights protection, procedural law and power restriction. The third part expounds the legislation status quo of technical investigation in our country. It analyzes the shortcomings of the legislative situation of technical investigation from four aspects: the scope of application is not clear, the subject of approval is unreasonable, the execution procedure is not standard, and there is a lack of effective right relief mechanism. The fourth part introduces the legislation status of technical investigation in Anglo-American law system and civil law system. By summarizing and comparing the legislative situation of the main countries ruled by law, the author draws the enlightenment of constructing the legal regulation of technical investigation. The fifth part elaborates the way to perfect the legal regulation of the technical investigation, aiming at the deficiency of the third part, from the application scope, the approval subject, the execution procedure, the related right relief mechanism to perfect our country technical investigation legal regulation. To ensure the effective conduct of investigation links.
【学位授予单位】：吉林财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】