论我国第三人撤销之诉制度及其适用

发布时间：2018-05-04 00:34

本文选题：新《民事诉讼法》 + 第三人　；参考：《厦门大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国新《民事诉讼法》第56条第3款明确增设第三人撤销之诉制度,该制度为一种以保护第三人合法权益为首要目的的事后特殊救济制度。以此为契机,本文将对我国第三人撤销之诉制度及其适用进行分析与探讨,通过对法国、日本以及我国台湾地区、澳门地区相似规定比较分析的基础上,剖析我国第三人撤销之诉制度在诉讼主体、诉讼客体、具体程序建构及配套制度等方面存在的不足之处,并提出完善该制度的相关建议。本文除引言及结语外,共分为四章。第一章第三人撤销之诉概述。该章在讨论了第三人撤销之诉的内涵定义的基础上,进一步分析了其性质。第二章第三人撤销之诉之相关域外法及我国立法现状。该章主要介绍了法国、日本、我国台湾地区以及澳门地区关于第三人撤销之诉的相关规定。并通过这些域外立法的比较以及对我国立法现状的分析,试图引出我国目前存在的问题。第三章我国第三人撤销之诉之具体机制构建。该章分析了我国第三人撤销之诉制度的功能定位,探讨了其在我国司法实践中的实现途径,以及适用范围,并提出第三人撤销之诉的具体程序构建以及配套制度的一些建议。第四章第三人权益保护体系之内部协调适用。该章分析了第三人撤销之诉与第三人诉讼、第三人异议之诉以及第三人申请再审之诉之间的联系和区别,试图协调其在具体实践中的适用,以期避免制度上的重置和实践上的模糊。
[Abstract]:Article 56, paragraph 3, of the new Civil procedure Law of our country explicitly establishes the system of the third party's revocation, which is a special relief system after the event whose primary purpose is to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the third party. Taking this opportunity as an opportunity, this paper will analyze and discuss the system and its application of the third party's revocation in China, on the basis of comparative analysis of similar provisions in France, Japan, Taiwan and Macao. This paper analyzes the deficiencies of the system of the third party's revocation in the aspects of the subject, object, concrete procedure construction and supporting system, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect the system. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into four chapters. The first chapter is a summary of the third party's action of revocation. On the basis of discussing the connotation definition of the third party's revocation action, this chapter further analyzes its nature. The second chapter is about the relevant extraterritorial laws and the current legislation of our country. This chapter mainly introduces the relevant provisions of the third party revocation action in France, Japan, Taiwan and Macao. Through the comparison of these extraterritorial legislation and the analysis of the present situation of our country's legislation, this paper tries to draw out the existing problems in our country. The third chapter is about the construction of the specific mechanism of the third party's revocation in our country. This chapter analyzes the functional orientation of the system of the third party's revocation in our country, probes into the way of its realization in our country's judicial practice and its application scope, and puts forward some suggestions for the concrete procedure construction and the supporting system of the third party's revocation. Chapter IV the internal coordination and application of the third party rights and interests protection system. This chapter analyzes the relationship and difference between the third party's revocation action and the third party's action, the third party's dissent action and the third party's application for retrial, and tries to coordinate its application in concrete practice. In order to avoid institutional reset and practical ambiguity.
【学位授予单位】：厦门大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】