秋审个案与清末司法审判

发布时间：2018-05-04 20:23

本文选题：清末 + 秋审个案　；参考：《南京社会科学》2013年02期

【摘要】：秋审作为体现国家权力的重要司法制度,在明清两朝的政治制度史上占有重要的地位。作为死行裁决的最终阶段,秋审又将行使死刑终审权的皇帝与一个个普通的犯人联系在了一起,实现了形式上的上下沟通。因此,通过对秋审个案的研究,可以了解从犯人到地方政府、从刑部到皇帝等的种种作用。而将这些不同角色的作用循序联合,进行考察,便可管窥清末司法审判制度的运作情实。本文以光绪二十九年秋审中的一件案件为出发点,对刑部与给事中关于该案的不同意见进行了法理寻绎和深入的司法推导,并试着探寻争论的起因,最后对本案的结果及意义进行了分析和讨论。
[Abstract]:As an important judicial system reflecting state power, autumn trial occupies an important position in the history of political system of Ming and Qing dynasties. As the final stage of death judgment, the autumn trial connected the emperor who exercised the right of final adjudication of death penalty with one ordinary prisoner, and realized formal communication between the upper and lower levels. Therefore, through the case study of autumn trial, we can understand the various functions from prisoners to local governments, from torture departments to emperors. By combining the roles of these different roles, we can see the operation of the judicial system in the late Qing Dynasty. Based on a case that Guang Xu tried in the autumn of 29, this paper tries to explore the causes of the dispute between the Ministry of Criminal Affairs and the Ministry of torture in the light of the legal theory and in-depth judicial derivation of the different opinions on the case, and tries to find out the causes of the dispute in the light of the case before Guang Xu in the autumn of 29. Finally, the results and significance of the case are analyzed and discussed.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学历史学院;北京师范大学历史学院;
【分类号】：D929;D926.2;K249

【共引文献】