我国诉前行为保全申请的实践难题:成因与出路

发布时间：2018-05-07 03:19

本文选题：知识产权 + 诉前行为保全　；参考：《环球法律评论》2016年04期

【摘要】：我国民事诉讼法虽然确立了诉前行为保全制度,但是实践中申请保全却存在一定困难,这是困扰知识产权权利人和利害关系人的一个顽疾,亦导致我国立法、司法和理论研究之间产生一定割裂。除了与"起诉难"具有共通的制度背景,"申请难"还存在独特的制度成因,其理论根源可以被归结为对诉权范围的限缩、对程序事项的轻视和对证明标准的误读。通过拓展诉权范畴,建立多维度的诉权体系,可以在理论上克服立案登记制改革的盲区。通过对《民事诉讼法》第101条、《民诉法解释》第108条和第109条进行体系解释,可以建立证明标准的三层结构,以"说明理由"和"可能"为标志,将诉前行为保全及部分程序事项的证明标准界定为疏明。事实上,只有将解决"申请难"作为立案登记制改革的重要一环,在增加诉讼供给和完善司法救助的背景下,通过坚持优势盖然性标准,才能从根本上完善我国的诉前行为保全制度。
[Abstract]:Although the civil procedure law of our country has established the system of preservation of acts before litigation, there are some difficulties in applying for preservation in practice, which is a stubborn disease that puzzles the intellectual property right holders and interested parties, and also leads to the legislation of our country. There is a certain division between judicial and theoretical research. In addition to having a common institutional background with "difficulty to sue", there are also unique institutional causes for "difficulty of application". Its theoretical roots can be attributed to the limitation of the scope of the right of action, the contempt of procedural matters and the misreading of the standard of proof. By expanding the category of the right of action and establishing a multi-dimensional system of the right of action, we can theoretically overcome the blind spot of the reform of the registration system. Through the systematic interpretation of article 101 of the Civil procedure Code and articles 108 and 109 of the Civil procedure Law, the three-tier structure of the standard of proof can be established, marked by "explanation of reasons" and "possibility". The standard of proof of preservation of pre-action act and some procedural matters is defined as clarification. In fact, only by taking the solution of "application difficulties" as an important part of the reform of the registration system, under the background of increasing the supply of litigation and improving judicial assistance, can we adhere to the criteria of superiority and inevitability. In order to fundamentally perfect our country's system of preservation of pre-action.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【基金】：清华大学微软知识产权项目的研究成果
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】