制度效益取向的法律解释理论——评《不确定状态下的裁判:法律解释的制度理论》

发布时间：2018-05-07 10:54

本文选题：法律解释方法 + 制度能力　；参考：《清华法学》2013年05期

【摘要】：解释方法之间的适用位序,是法律解释理论的一个元问题。基于制度能力、体制性影响和成本效益分析,《不确定状态下的裁判——法律解释的制度理论》主张:在法律文本明白而清晰时,解释应遵从法律文本的字面含义;在法律文本模棱两可时,法院应服从立法或行政机关对法律文本的解释。这一主张被批评为一种粗陋的文本主义解释,因为将法律解释问题化约为司法成本最小化的计算,不一定妥当;运用成本收益的分析方法所进行的体制性影响评估,不一定可靠;对法院和行政机关的制度能力分析,也不一定准确。法律解释的制度理论的贡献,只限于用一套复杂的成本效益分析法,强调了法治和法律解释实践的形式合理性之维。
[Abstract]:The order of application between interpretation methods is a meta-problem in the theory of legal interpretation. Based on institutional capacity, institutional impact and cost-benefit analysis, "system theory of adjudication-legal interpretation in uncertain state" advocates: when the legal text is clear and clear, the interpretation should follow the literal meaning of the legal text; When the legal text is ambiguous, the court should accept the interpretation of the legal text from the legislative or executive organs. This claim has been criticized as a crude textual interpretation, since it is not always appropriate to make legal interpretation a calculation that minimizes judicial costs; and institutional impact assessments using cost-benefit analysis methods, Not necessarily reliable; the analysis of the institutional capacity of courts and administrative organs is not necessarily accurate. The contribution of the system theory of legal interpretation is limited to a complex cost-benefit analysis method, which emphasizes the dimension of the rule of law and the formal rationality of the practice of legal interpretation.
【作者单位】：浙江大学光华法学院;
【基金】：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助国家社科基金项目“法律解释的激励机制研究”
【分类号】：D916

【相似文献】