刑事诉讼中电子证据可采性规则的研究

发布时间：2018-05-07 11:47

本文选题：电子证据 + 刑事诉讼　；参考：《内蒙古大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：电子证据是随着社会的进步,信息技术的发展及应用而出现的新的证据种类。在我国新修的《刑事诉讼法》中,也赋予了“电子数据”独立的法律地位。但是有关电子证据相关的法律规范仍有待完善,电子证据的可采性就是其中重要的一部分。按照我国的主流观点,证据需要具备关联性、合法性、真实性才能被采纳,电子证据亦然。电子证据的关联性要求与传统证据相比差别不大,所以对电子证据合法性和真实性的认定是其认证的重点。本文通过对电子证据特征的分析,借鉴国外电子证据立法经验,得出电子证据可采性认定的标准,最后通过结合我国相关的立法情况,对我国刑事诉讼中电子证据可采性的认证规则提出完善建议。文章共有四个部分,第一部分是对电子证据及其可采性的分析,通过论述电子证据特点和其可采性的含义,明确电子证据与传统证据类型的不同以及其可采性认证规则的价值；第二部分是对国外电子证据立法的借鉴,按照对待电子证据不同的做法选取了英国、美国、加拿大三个在电子证据立法上较为发达的国家进行研究,得出国外在电子证据可采性的基本理论；第三部分是对我国现阶段电子证据立法的研究,通过分层次的对我国现阶段立法进行分析,发现我国在电子证据立法方面的问题,尤其是电子证据可采性上存在的问题；第四部分是对我国电子证据可采性规则的完善,分为对关联性、合法性、真实性三方面的完善,尤其以后两者为重点,研究电子证据认证规则中非法证据排除规则、电子证据的取证、最佳证据规则、以及电子证据认定方式等对其可采性的影响,完善我国刑事诉讼中的电子证据可采性规则。
[Abstract]:Electronic evidence is a new type of evidence emerging with the progress of society and the development and application of information technology. In the newly revised Criminal procedure Law of our country, the independent legal status of Electronic data is also given. However, the relevant legal norms of electronic evidence still need to be improved, and the admissibility of electronic evidence is an important part of it. According to the mainstream view of our country, evidence needs relevance, legitimacy and authenticity to be accepted, and so is electronic evidence. The relevance requirement of electronic evidence is not different from that of traditional evidence, so the recognition of the validity and authenticity of electronic evidence is the key point of its authentication. Based on the analysis of the characteristics of electronic evidence and the experience of foreign countries in the legislation of electronic evidence, this paper draws the standards of the admissibility of electronic evidence, and finally combines the relevant legislation situation of our country. This paper puts forward some suggestions on the authentication rules of the admissibility of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings in China. There are four parts in this paper. The first part is the analysis of electronic evidence and its admissibility. By discussing the characteristics of electronic evidence and the meaning of its admissibility, the paper clarifies the difference between electronic evidence and traditional evidence and the value of the rules of admissibility certification. The second part is to draw lessons from foreign electronic evidence legislation, according to the different treatment of electronic evidence in the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada in the three more developed countries in electronic evidence legislation for research. The third part is to study the current legislation of electronic evidence in our country, through the analysis of the current legislation of our country, find out the problems in the legislation of electronic evidence in our country. The fourth part is the perfection of the rules of admissibility of electronic evidence in China, which is divided into three aspects: relevance, legitimacy and authenticity. This paper studies the influence of illegal evidence exclusion rule, electronic evidence collection rule, best evidence rule, and electronic evidence identification method on the admissibility of electronic evidence authentication rules in order to perfect the rules of admissibility of electronic evidence in criminal proceedings in our country.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】