网络购物合同纠纷诉讼管辖研究

发布时间：2018-05-07 15:27

本文选题：网络购物合同 + 消费者原地管辖　；参考：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：互联网科技的飞速进步催生了电子商务交易的蓬勃发展。网络购物合同作为最重要的新兴电子商务模式已深入各行各业。但随着需求与服务的多样化，网络购物合同纠纷日益增多，消费者与商家之间因管辖纠纷问题矛盾频发。但因我国现有管辖规则以传统合同模式为基础制定，欠缺与新兴网络购物合同新特性的兼容性，从而滞后于社会发展，无法满足当事人双方的需求。本文通过分析我国现有合同管辖规则的相关规定，提出存在的不足，明确对网络购物合同纠纷诉讼管辖规则进行修改和完善的必要性，，并对新兴管辖权理论和美国、欧盟等西方发达国家和组织的先进立法、司法和审判经验进行介绍和评析，取其精华，因地制宜，提出对我国网络购物合同纠纷诉讼管辖问题的解决建议。本文从正文上分为导言、正文和结语三部分。正文分为四章，第一章是介绍网络购物合同纠纷诉讼管辖的现状。现状部分主要分为两节：第一节介绍了网络购物合同的含义、性质和特征，第二节则根据现有立法规定和司法实践分析了我国在网络购物合同纠纷诉讼管辖方面产生的问题以及原因。通过对网路购物合同及其管辖权问题的具体了解，明确我国网络购物合同中诉讼管辖规则修改的必要性。第二章是网络购物合同纠纷诉讼管辖的理论依据。其中涉及了目前学术界对于网络购物合同管辖权的新理论。通过对三种理论的利弊进行分析，从而对后文中管辖规则的构建发挥一定的指导作用。第三章是域外网络购物合同纠纷诉讼管辖的规则与评析。主要是以不同的管辖规则为划分依据，介绍美国、欧盟等发达国家和组织在处理管辖纠纷方面应用的理论与规则，并对各项规则的应用进行评析，从而为完善我国网络购物合同诉讼管辖规则提供借鉴。第四章是我国网络购物合同纠纷诉讼管辖问题的完善建议。该章主要是对现有法律规定和传统规则进行修改或扩充，提出措施解决第一章中网络购物合同中所存在的管辖区域模糊、法官裁判随意以及消费者权利保护不利的问题。
[Abstract]:The rapid progress of Internet science and technology has given birth to the vigorous development of e-commerce transactions. As the most important new e-commerce mode, online shopping contract has penetrated into various industries. However, with the diversification of demand and service, online shopping contract disputes are increasing day by day, and conflicts between consumers and merchants occur frequently because of jurisdiction disputes. However, the existing jurisdiction rules of our country are based on the traditional contract model, which lacks the compatibility with the new characteristics of the new online shopping contract, and thus lags behind the social development and can not meet the needs of both parties. Based on the analysis of the relevant provisions of the existing contract jurisdiction rules in China, this paper puts forward the shortcomings, makes clear the necessity of revising and perfecting the jurisdiction rules of online shopping contract disputes, and gives an analysis of the emerging jurisdiction theory and the United States. The advanced legislation, judicature and judicial experience of the European Union and other western developed countries and organizations are introduced and evaluated, the essence of which is selected, and suggestions are put forward to solve the jurisdiction of disputes over online shopping contracts in our country according to local conditions. This paper is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four chapters, the first chapter is to introduce the status of online shopping contract disputes jurisdiction. The present situation is divided into two sections: the first section introduces the meaning, nature and characteristics of online shopping contract. In the second section, according to the existing legislation and judicial practice, the author analyzes the problems and causes in the jurisdiction of online shopping contract disputes in China. Through the concrete understanding of the online shopping contract and its jurisdiction, the necessity of modifying the rules of litigation jurisdiction in the online shopping contract in China is clarified. The second chapter is the theoretical basis of litigation jurisdiction of online shopping contract disputes. Which involves the current academic community for online shopping contract jurisdiction of the new theory. Through the analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the three theories, it plays a guiding role in the construction of jurisdiction rules. The third chapter is the rules and comments on the jurisdiction of online shopping contract disputes. Based on different jurisdiction rules, this paper introduces the theories and rules applied by developed countries and organizations such as the United States, the European Union and other developed countries in dealing with jurisdiction disputes, and comments on the application of these rules. So as to perfect our country network shopping contract lawsuit jurisdiction rule provides the reference. The fourth chapter is our country network shopping contract dispute lawsuit jurisdiction question consummation suggestion. The main purpose of this chapter is to modify or expand the existing legal provisions and traditional rules, and to put forward some measures to solve the problems of ambiguity of jurisdiction in the first chapter of online shopping contracts, arbitrariness of judges' decisions and unfavorable protection of consumers' rights.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】