当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

检察机关捕诉资源整合办案机制研究

发布时间:2018-05-11 21:32

  本文选题:检察机关 + 捕诉资源整合 ; 参考:《东北师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:审查逮捕和审查起诉两项职能是检察机关刑事法律监督的重要职能,分别由侦查监督部门和公诉部门承担,共同发挥打击追诉犯罪、监督侦查权力、保障人权等作用。我国检察机关长期遵循的这种“捕诉分立”的刑事检察工作模式,却产生了诸如办案质量不高、诉讼效率低下、监督乏力等无法适应当前检察工作形势的一系列问题。为了公正高效行使捕诉职能,本文在原有“捕诉合一”办案模式理论与实践基础上,以吉林省检察机关捕诉关系改革工作为研究样本,提出以“捕诉资源整合”办案机制作为解决当前“捕诉分立”所带来的一系列问题的刑事检察工作模式。第一部分,从侦查监督与公诉两项职能的性质和内容入手,对检察制度改革过程中二者关系的沿革来展开探讨,厘清捕诉职能的内在区别与联系;第二部分,对我国检察机关现有捕诉关系的现状进行分析,重点论证了“捕诉资源整合”办案机制的可行性;第三部分,结合吉林省检察机关的实践探索,围绕“捕诉资源整合”办案机制概念及特点,全面阐述了该机制在制度保障、运行效果以及实践中的价值作用;第四部分,从加强诉讼监督的路径探索、科学设计办案规则流程、规范开展检察引导侦查工作、推进司法办案“去行政化”、有机结合“案件繁简分流”工作机制、合理设置对刑事案件考核机制和考核指标、刑事检察队伍建设的远景规划七个方面,对“捕诉资源整合”办案机制提出了进一步的完善意见和路径规划。
[Abstract]:The two functions of examining and arresting and examining and prosecuting are the important functions of the procuratorial organs' criminal legal supervision, which are respectively undertaken by the investigation and supervision departments and the public prosecution departments, and play a joint role in cracking down on the prosecution of crimes, supervising the powers of investigation, and safeguarding human rights. This pattern of criminal procuratorial work, which has been followed by procuratorial organs for a long time, has produced a series of problems, such as low quality of handling cases, low efficiency of litigation, weak supervision and so on, which can not adapt to the current situation of procuratorial work. In order to carry out the function of prosecution fairly and efficiently, this paper, based on the theory and practice of the original mode of "the unity of arrest and prosecution", takes the reform of the relationship between the prosecution and the prosecution of Jilin Province as the research sample. This paper puts forward the criminal procuratorial work mode to solve a series of problems brought about by the separation of arrest and prosecution with the mechanism of "integrating the resources of arrest and prosecution". The first part, starting with the nature and content of the two functions of investigation supervision and public prosecution, discusses the evolution of the relationship between the two functions in the course of the procuratorial system reform, and clarifies the inherent differences and links between the two functions. Based on the analysis of the current situation of the relationship between the prosecution and the prosecution in China, the author emphatically demonstrates the feasibility of the case handling mechanism of "the integration of the resources of the arrest and prosecution". The third part, combined with the practice of the procuratorial organs in Jilin Province, Focusing on the concept and characteristics of the case handling mechanism of "integrating the resources of arrest and litigation", this paper comprehensively expounds the value function of the mechanism in the system guarantee, operation effect and practice. Scientifically design the flow of case handling rules, standardize the procuratorial work, guide the investigation, promote the "de-administration" of judicial handling cases, organically combine the work mechanism of "simple and simple case diversion", and reasonably set up the examination mechanism and assessment indicators for criminal cases. There are seven aspects of the long-term planning of the construction of the criminal procuratorial team, and some suggestions and path planning are put forward for the case handling mechanism of "the integration of the resources of arrest and prosecution".
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2;D926.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 谢登科;;功能与进路:最高人民法院巡回法庭探析[J];朝阳法律评论;2016年01期

2 汪海燕;;检察机关审查逮捕权异化与消解[J];政法论坛;2014年06期

3 楼伯坤;;论我国逮捕权的归属——以检察机关拥有侦查权为前提[J];浙江工商大学学报;2013年02期

4 朱孝清;;论诉讼监督[J];国家检察官学院学报;2011年05期

5 谢维;;检察机关捕诉一体化工作机制的创新研究[J];广西师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年S2期

6 吴峤滨;论检察权的性质及其优化设置[J];福州大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2002年04期

7 姜伟;公诉的价值[J];法学研究;2002年02期

8 陈卫东;我国检察权的反思与重构——以公诉权为核心的分析[J];法学研究;2002年02期

9 许永俊,王宏伟;捕诉合一办案机制研究[J];国家检察官学院学报;2001年01期

10 陈瑞华;司法权的性质——以刑事司法为范例的分析[J];法学研究;2000年05期

相关重要报纸文章 前2条

1 孙峰松;王默;牟莎莎;;在改革中砥砺前行的吉林检察[N];吉林日报;2017年

2 郑博超;;守在纠错案防冤案前沿[N];检察日报;2016年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 陈亮;检察机关捕诉关系研究[D];华东政法大学;2011年



本文编号:1875714

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1875714.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e4e70***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com