新刑诉法视域下刑事和解制度的价值冲突与整合路径

发布时间：2018-05-12 23:11

本文选题：新刑诉法 + 刑事和解　；参考：《求索》2017年01期

【摘要】：刑事和解制度是《刑事诉讼法》修改中创设的新型刑事诉讼模式,具有贯彻“宽严相济”刑事思想、提高诉讼效率和节省司法资源的功能,在保护被害人合法权益、教育改造加害人以及维护社会稳定方面,能弥补我国刑事法律制度的不足。因此,构建中国特色的刑事和解制度便成了必然选择。新刑诉法的修改正式引入刑事和解制度,充分体现了惩治犯罪也要坚持以人为本、从人性出发的政策理念,契合了当代人性关怀下的刑事政策价值导向,提供了刑事责任履行的全新方法,为摆脱责任论的研究困境展示了可能性。但在人性视野下,刑事和解制度也存在认识偏差、自愿性没有保障、适用范围有限、特殊预防效果不明显、没有体现效率价值等问题。因此,应对新刑诉法视域下的刑事和解制度的价值冲突与整合路径进行研究。
[Abstract]:The system of criminal reconciliation is a new pattern of criminal procedure created in the revision of Criminal procedure Law. It has the function of carrying out the criminal thought of "combining leniency with severity", improving the efficiency of litigation and saving judicial resources, and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the victims. Education reform victimizer and maintain social stability, can make up for the shortcomings of our criminal law system. Therefore, the construction of the criminal reconciliation system with Chinese characteristics has become an inevitable choice. The revision of the new Criminal procedure Law formally introduces the system of criminal reconciliation, which fully reflects the policy concept of punishing crime and adhering to the people-oriented, starting from human nature, which accords with the value orientation of criminal policy under the care of contemporary human nature. It provides a new way to fulfill criminal liability and shows the possibility of getting rid of the dilemma of responsibility theory. However, in the view of human nature, the criminal reconciliation system also has some problems, such as cognitive bias, lack of voluntary protection, limited scope of application, no obvious effect of special prevention, no value of efficiency and so on. Therefore, we should study the value conflict and integration path of the criminal reconciliation system under the new criminal procedure law.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学法学院;

【相似文献】