论庭审实质化视角下庭前会议制度的完善

发布时间：2018-05-13 11:16

本文选题：刑事法庭前会议 + 庭审实质化　；参考：《辽宁大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：2012年《刑事诉讼法》确立了庭前会议制度,对于提高诉讼效率,维持审判集中审理具有重要意义。因为庭前会议是审前程序和庭审程序的有效衔接,所以作为法庭审理的过渡性程序,有必要将庭审实质化的理念融入到庭前会议中。本文运用了比较的研究方法,通过研究英国的答辩指导听审和预备听审程序、美国的庭前会议制度、法国的刑事庭前程序、德国的中间程序,分析优缺点,总结对我国庭前会议的启示,着力完善庭前会议制度。论文共包括四个部分,第一部分,通过庭审实质化的视角引入庭前会议制度,对庭审实质化涵义以及内容的剖析,引出对庭前会议解决问题范围以及效力问题的探讨。第二部分,通过对国外相关制度的分析,根据相关的启示对后续制度完善作出铺垫。第三部分,引出我国庭前会议在适用过程中存在的问题,信息整合和争点整理功能定位模糊,被告人参与权不确定,庭前会议的主持者规定笼统以及庭前会议效力不明确等。第四部分,通过相关问题的分析,提出完善的建议,明确庭前会议的功能,确定庭前会议的主体,规范结果的形成和效力以及对相关效力事项的异议权。
[Abstract]:In 2012, the Criminal procedure Law established the system of pretrial meeting, which is of great significance for improving the efficiency of litigation and maintaining the centralized trial. Because the pretrial meeting is the effective connection between the pretrial procedure and the court procedure, it is necessary to incorporate the concept of substantial trial into the pre-court meeting as the transitional procedure of the court hearing. This paper uses comparative research methods to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the British defense guidance hearing and preparatory hearing procedure, the American pretrial conference system, the French criminal pretrial procedure, and the German intermediate procedure. Summarize the enlightenment to our country's pre-court meeting and try to perfect the pre-court meeting system. The thesis includes four parts. The first part introduces the system of pretrial conference from the perspective of the materialization of the trial, analyzes the meaning and content of the substance of the trial, and discusses the scope and effectiveness of the resolution of the problem in the pre-trial meeting. The second part, through the analysis of the relevant systems abroad, according to the relevant inspiration to improve the follow-up system to make a foreshadowing. The third part leads to the problems existing in the application process of the pretrial conference in our country. The function of information integration and points of contention is vague, the participation right of the accused is uncertain, the presiding officer of the pre-court meeting is general and the effectiveness of the pre-court meeting is not clear, and so on. The fourth part, through the analysis of related problems, puts forward the perfect suggestions, defines the function of the pre-court meeting, determines the subject of the pre-court meeting, the formation and effectiveness of the normative results and the right of dissent to the relevant validity matters.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】