论法院民刑交叉案件的审理困境及克服
发布时间:2018-05-16 05:17
本文选题:民刑交叉案件 + 司法困境 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:“健全行政执法和刑事司法衔接机制,,完善案件移送标准和程序,建立行政执法机关、公安机关、检察机关、审判机关信息共享、案情通报、案件移送制度,坚决克服有案不移、有案难移、以罚代刑现象,实现行政处罚和刑事处罚的无缝对接。”上述内容是十八界四中全会公报中的一部分,该部分内容反映出了当前司法形势下执法机关、公安机关、检察机关、审判机关存在着严重问题。有鉴于此,本文通过从民刑交叉案件的形成原因入手进行分析,剖析了法院在立、审、执过程中对民刑交叉案件处理存在的困难,也列举了目前实践中法院审理民刑交叉案件的真实案例分析,并且从刑诉法、民诉法等视角,提出了处理民刑交叉案件的建议。
[Abstract]:"to improve the convergence mechanism between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice, to perfect the standards and procedures for the transfer of cases, and to establish a system of information sharing between administrative law enforcement organs, public security organs, procuratorial organs, judicial organs, notification of cases and transfer of cases," "We must resolutely overcome the problem of not moving cases and difficult to remove cases, so as to achieve a seamless docking between administrative punishment and criminal punishment." The above contents are part of the communique of the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, which reflects the serious problems existing in the law enforcement organs, public security organs, procuratorial organs and judicial organs under the current judicial situation. In view of this, this paper analyzes the reasons for the formation of civil and criminal cross cases, and analyzes the difficulties existing in the handling of civil and criminal cross cases in the process of court establishment, trial and execution. It also enumerates the real case analysis of the trial of civil and criminal cross cases in court at present, and puts forward some suggestions to deal with civil and criminal cross cases from the angles of criminal procedure law, civil procedure law and so on.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 陈兴良,胡建生,朱平,李克;关于“先刑后民”司法原则的反思[J];北京市政法管理干部学院学报;2004年02期
2 江伟,范跃如;刑民交叉案件处理机制研究[J];法商研究;2005年04期
3 王利明;;最高法院报告呈现四大亮点[J];法制资讯;2012年Z1期
本文编号:1895612
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1895612.html