医学专家出庭的困惑:法律思考与伦理思辨

发布时间：2018-05-16 04:35

  本文选题：专家辅助人 + 专家证人　； 参考：《医学与哲学(A)》2017年09期

【摘要】：医学专家在刑事诉讼中出庭制度设计的立法预期在于实现对鉴定意见的有效质证,帮助法官准确理解专门性问题。但法律及司法解释对出庭专家的角色定位、意见属性等问题规定模糊,不仅导致理解出现分歧,也使专家在出庭问题上面临困惑,制度实际运行中出庭率低,难以实现制度预设价值。以最为常见的医学专家这一群体为研究面向,从法律和伦理角度进行深层次思辨,提出专家意见定位的中立性是消解困惑、解除症结的根本,通过对医学专家领域小视角的具体问题剖析折射刑事诉讼大制度的应然规则设计。
[Abstract]:The legislative expectation of the design of medical experts' appearance system in criminal procedure is to realize the effective cross-examination of the appraisal opinion and to help the judge to understand the specialized problem accurately. However, the legal and judicial interpretations not only lead to differences in understanding, but also make experts face confusion in court appearance and low court attendance rate in the actual operation of the system, because of the ambiguity of legal and judicial interpretations on the role of court experts, the nature of opinions, and so on. It is difficult to realize the preset value of system. Taking the most common medical experts as the research direction, and thinking deeply from the angle of law and ethics, the author points out that the neutralization of the expert opinion is the fundamental way to resolve the confusion and relieve the crux of the problem. By analyzing the specific problems of medical experts from a small angle of view, this paper analyzes the design of the ought-be rules for refracting the large system of criminal procedure.
【作者单位】： 辽宁大学法学院;大连医科大学人文与社会科学学院;大连医科大学职业发展教研室;
【基金】：2017年四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地四川医事卫生法治研究中心课题(YF17-Y18) 2013年教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(13YJC820087) 2014年辽宁省社会科学规划基金重点项目(L14FX003) 2016年教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(16YJCZH087)
【分类号】：D925.2
，

本文编号：1895493