民事再审检察监督制度研究

发布时间：2018-05-16 14:44

本文选题：检察监督 + 诉权保障　；参考：《吉林财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：当前,在司法界,围绕司法公正和独立的价值取向而展开的权力监督体系和模式在不断地构建和完善中。2013年9月23日最高人民检察院第十二届检察委员会第十次会议通过的《人民检察院民事诉讼监督规则(试行)》及相应的实务运用,实践中不断面临新的问题,检法冲突剧增、当事人诉权救济自主性被虚置,抗诉与再审检察建议的适用缺乏明确的界限和情形,这些问题使得检察职能不能真正发挥应有作用。再审检察监督制度作为民事检察监督制度的一个具体制度,在其理论发展和实践运行的过程中,不断衍生出新问题。理论上的不断探索和推进,实践中制度运行的乏力,这种缺乏较高契合与磨合度的检察机制,极大地影响着司法公正事业发展的速度和效益。在法治理论应用于实践的立法工作中,民事检察监督制度的发展呈现出新突破。但是,立法规范的原则性并不能为民事检察监督工作的现实开展提供更具有可操作性的规范指导,这使得在现实的检察工作中,旧有问题的解决未找到切实有效的方法,诚如民事检察监督如何定位,检法关系的剑拔弩张怎样实现司法和谐。同时,新的问题又不断出现,民事再审检察监督的运行如何协调好诉权、检察权与审判权的关系,以及微观视角下抗诉与再审检察建议适用上的分工与衔接等。为此,笔者认为,本着发现问题-分析问题-解决问题的路径,主要应从三个部分进行研究:首先,在明确再审之诉发生情形的前提下来定位再审检察监督;其次,切实保障当事人诉权救济的优先性,不失民事诉讼的本质属性;最后从检法关系协调的目的出发,完善司法交流与沟通,健全再审检察监督中抗诉与再审检察建议的衔接适用机制,以期从内在的程序完善和外在的司法环境保障方面对我国民事再审检察监督制度的完善提出一定的有益建议。
[Abstract]:Now, in the judiciary, The system and mode of power supervision around the value orientation of judicial impartiality and independence are constantly being constructed and perfected. < the people] adopted by the Tenth meeting of the Twelfth Procuratorial Committee of the Supreme people's Procuratorate on September 23, 2013 Rules for Supervision of Civil Proceedings by Procuratorates (for trial implementation) > and corresponding practical application, In practice, there are many new problems, such as the sharp increase of the conflict of procuratorial law, the emptiness of the relief autonomy of the litigant's right of action, and the lack of clear limits and circumstances for the application of the procuratorial proposal of protest and retrial. These problems make the procuratorial function unable to play its due role. As a concrete system of the civil procuratorial supervision system, the retrial procuratorial supervision system has spawned new problems in the course of its theoretical development and practical operation. The constant exploration and promotion in theory, the weak running of the system in practice and the lack of a procuratorial mechanism with a high degree of compatibility and running-in greatly affect the speed and efficiency of the development of the cause of judicial justice. The development of civil procuratorial supervision system presents a new breakthrough in the application of the rule of law theory in the legislative work of practice. However, the principle of legislative norms can not provide a more operational normative guidance for the development of civil procuratorial supervision, which makes the solution of old problems in the actual procuratorial work has not found a practical and effective method. Such as how to position civil procuratorial supervision, how to achieve judicial harmony. At the same time, new problems appear constantly, how to coordinate the operation of civil retrial procuratorial supervision, the relationship between procuratorial power and judicial power, and the division of labor and convergence in the application of procuratorial suggestions of protest and retrial from the micro perspective, etc. For this reason, the author believes that, in the light of the path of discovering problems, analyzing problems and solving problems, we should mainly study from three parts: first, to locate the procuratorial supervision of retrial under the premise of making clear the occurrence of retrial cases; secondly, to make sure that the procuratorial supervision of retrial occurs. To ensure the priority of litigant's right of action, and not to lose the essential attribute of civil action; finally, to perfect judicial exchange and communication for the purpose of coordinating the relationship between procurators and law, In order to improve the supervision system of civil retrial procuratorial supervision in our country, it is necessary to perfect the connection and application mechanism between protest and retrial procuratorial suggestion in order to put forward some beneficial suggestions from the aspects of internal procedure perfection and external judicial environment guarantee.
【学位授予单位】：吉林财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【相似文献】