我国正当程序原则的规范诠释与体系构造——以宪法上的“禁止非法搜查”为中心

发布时间：2018-05-16 14:55

本文选题：禁止非法搜查 + 非法证据排除　；参考：《浙江学刊》2017年03期

【摘要】：宪法第37、39条规定的"禁止非法搜查"可以作为我国正当程序原则的规范基础。各类违法行政行为和刑事侦查行为所获得的证据应当作为非法证据予以排除,这是宪法"禁止非法搜查"规范的立法表达。以我国宪法上的"禁止非法搜查"为中心,展开法教义学的规范诠释与体系构造,是发展我国正当程序原则的一种可能路径。将现有刑事诉讼法、行政诉讼法中的非法证据排除规则,结合"禁止非法搜查"的宪法规定,提炼出我国的正当程序原则。作为统一的公法原则,正当程序原则应当在修宪时写入宪法,或者通过宪法解释加以明确,并辐射行政程序法、刑事诉讼法等公法体系。
[Abstract]:The prohibition of illegal search stipulated in Article 37 of the Constitution can be taken as the normative basis of the principle of due process in our country. The evidence obtained from all kinds of illegal administrative acts and criminal investigations should be excluded as illegal evidence, which is the legislative expression of the norm of "forbidding illegal search" in the Constitution. It is a possible way to develop the principle of due process in our country by focusing on the constitutional prohibition of illegal search and the normative interpretation and system construction of the doctrine of law. According to the existing criminal procedure law, the rule of excluding illegal evidence in administrative procedure law and the constitutional provisions of "forbidding illegal search", the principle of due process in our country is abstracted. As a unified principle of public law, the principle of due process should be written into the constitution when the constitution is amended, or be clarified by the interpretation of the constitution, and the administrative procedure law, the criminal procedure law and other public law systems should be radiated.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：作者主持的国家社会科学基金项目《对国家干预经济的宪法规范研究》(编号:12CFX015) 北京市政治文明建设研究中心课题(编号:16zzwm006)
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】