非正当当事人处理方式研究——兼论我国非正当当事人处理制度之构建
发布时间:2018-05-16 16:20
本文选题:非正当当事人 + 当事人适格 ; 参考:《大连理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年04期
【摘要】:非正当当事人是我国民事诉讼理论中的悬案。我国对非正当当事人采任意化的处理方式,打破了诉权与审判权的平衡,破坏了程序的安定性,降低了诉讼效率。非正当当事人的要件属性决定了其处理方式,将非正当当事人作为诉讼要件或权利保护要件各有利弊,我国《民诉法》并未统一非正当原告与非正当被告的要件属性,违反了当事人平等原则。非正当当事人具体可类型化为自始不适格当事人与后续不适格当事人,这对修正"非正当当事人"与"非正当当事人的处理方式"之间的关系有重要意义。应从"非正当当事人"的本源出发,统一非正当当事人的处理方式,可推动我国民事诉讼的体系化、提高诉讼效率并保障当事人诉权。具体应以诉讼承继制度作为处理非正当当事人的基础,充分发挥法官阐明权并建立独立的救济机制。
[Abstract]:Illegitimate parties are unsolved cases in the theory of civil action in our country. In our country, the arbitrary way of dealing with the improper parties has broken the balance between the right of action and the right of adjudication, destroyed the stability of the procedure and reduced the efficiency of litigation. The attribute of the elements of the improper parties determines the way to deal with them. There are advantages and disadvantages in treating the improper parties as the elements of litigation or protection of rights. The Civil procedure Law of our country has not unified the attributes of the elements of the improper plaintiff and the improper defendant. In violation of the principle of equality of the parties. The concrete types of improper parties can be divided into unsuitable parties from beginning to end and unfit parties from later on, which is of great significance in revising the relationship between "improper parties" and "ways of dealing with illegitimate parties". We should start from the origin of "improper parties" and unify the ways of dealing with illegitimate parties, which can promote the systematization of civil litigation in our country, improve the efficiency of litigation and protect the litigant's right of action. The system of litigation succession should be taken as the basis of dealing with the illegitimate parties and the judge's right of clarification should be brought into full play and an independent relief mechanism should be established.
【作者单位】: 中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】:国家社科基金项目:“迈向制度理性的民事程序研究”(14CFX028) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目:“民事纠纷的多元化解决机制研究”(10XNI033)
【分类号】:D925.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 冯珂;关于正当当事人的若干思考[J];河南社会科学;2003年03期
2 肖建华,吴小隆;非正当当事人及其更换的法理分析[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2000年01期
3 肖建华,杨琦萍;非正当当事人与判决效力的主观范围[J];湖南省政法管理干部学院学报;2000年04期
4 滕琛;;谈公益诉讼视野下的正当当事人制度[J];商情(教育经济研究);2007年02期
5 张瑞杰;张瑞霞;;论非正当当事人的程序处理[J];商业文化(上半月);2012年01期
6 郭海洋;;论我国民事诉讼非正当当事人处理制度的完善[J];公民与法(法学版);2014年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 马超芬;论正当当事人制度[D];苏州大学;2009年
2 鞠敏;论非正当当事人更换制度[D];西南政法大学;2012年
3 宋春龙;论非正当当事人及其变更[D];华东政法大学;2014年
,本文编号:1897561
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1897561.html