论新民事诉讼法中的恶意诉讼

发布时间：2018-05-17 00:37

本文选题：恶意诉讼 + 滥用诉权　；参考：《暨南大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：当前的司法实践中，一方当事人出于非法的动机或目的，，通过外表合法的途径损害他人合法权益的恶意诉讼行为越来越多，且层出不穷。这种不正当的诉讼行为极大的损害了一方当事人甚至案外人的利益，给他人、集体甚至国家的名誉或者财产造成损失，同时，浪费了诉讼资源的浪费，扰乱了诉讼秩序，并损害了我国现行法律的权威，受到侵害的合法权益亟需救济。值得庆幸的是，新修改的民事诉讼法开始关注此种不法行为，有针对性地对这种行为进行约束。然而，新的民事诉讼法并没有建构出完善的恶意诉讼规制体系，从恶意诉讼的救济方面来说，更亟需完善。虽然当前恶意诉讼的概念、构成要件及基本性质等基本问题仍存在争议，但是比较国外相关经验，结合我国的基本国情、司法实践以及新民诉法的相关内容，针对恶意诉讼行为我们可以在事前救济、侵权救济、其他恶意诉讼救济和案外人救济等方面进行加强和完善，以使受到不法损害的合法权益得到补救。
[Abstract]:In the current judicial practice, there are more and more malicious litigation acts that one party damages the legitimate rights and interests of others through the appearance of lawful way for the illegal motive or purpose, and emerge one after another. Such improper litigation acts have greatly damaged the interests of one party or even the outsiders in the case, caused losses to others, collectives or even the reputation or property of the country, and at the same time wasted the resources of litigation and disrupted the order of the proceedings. And damaged the authority of our current law, infringed on the legitimate rights and interests in urgent need of relief. Fortunately, the newly amended Civil procedure Law begins to focus on such illegal acts and to restrain them in a targeted manner. However, the new civil procedure law does not construct a perfect system of malevolent litigation. Although there are still controversies on the concept, elements and basic nature of malicious litigation, comparing with the relevant experiences of foreign countries, combining with the basic national conditions of our country, judicial practice and the relevant contents of the New Civil procedure Law, We can strengthen and perfect the malevolent litigation in such aspects as prior remedy, tort remedy, other malicious litigation remedy and the remedy of the outsider in the case, so as to remedy the legitimate rights and interests that have been damaged by the malfeasance.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】