行政规范性文件司法审查的规则嬗变及其完善

发布时间：2018-05-18 10:39

本文选题：行政规范性文件 + 司法审查　；参考：《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年02期

【摘要】：尽管在整个法规范体系中行政规范性文件的位阶最低,但其在实践中的影响与作用则是巨大的。由于现行制度控制成效的有限性,行政规范性文件的失序、失范现象甚为严重。要在经由行政规范性文件的社会治理与有效规制行政规范性文件之间取得平衡,建立行政规范性文件的司法审查机制,是一项不可缺少的制度选择。1989年的《行政诉讼法》中已经内在地包含了对行政规范性文件的司法审查,后来的司法解释将其显性化并逐步具体化了其审查规则。2014年的新《行政诉讼法》则在原有主动审查的基础上,增设了依申请审查行政规范性文件。现行司法实践中,对行政规范性文件审查不力,除了司法技术层面上的原因外,司法审查制度本身尚存有诸多不足。行政诉讼中行政规范性文件所兼具的法源性和被审查性双重特征,决定了对行政规范性文件的司法审查,需要确立具有以下要素的保障机制:合适的审查机构、明确的审查方式、全面的审查范围、严格的审查标准、规范的审查程序、有力的审查结果。
[Abstract]:Although the rank of administrative normative documents is the lowest in the whole legal normative system, its influence and function in practice is enormous. Due to the limitation of the control effect of the current system, the disorder of administrative normative documents is very serious. We should strike a balance between the social governance through administrative normative documents and the effective regulation of administrative normative documents, and establish a judicial review mechanism for administrative normative documents. The 1989 Administrative procedure Law already contains the judicial review of administrative normative documents. The judicial interpretation later made it explicit and gradually concretized its review rules. The new Administrative procedure Law in 2014 added the administrative normative documents according to the application for examination on the basis of the original active review. In the current judicial practice, the review of administrative normative documents is weak, except for the reasons of judicial technical level, there are still many deficiencies in the judicial review system itself. The dual characteristics of the administrative normative documents in administrative litigation, which are both legal origin and reviewed nature, determine the judicial review of administrative normative documents, and it is necessary to establish the guarantee mechanism with the following elements: the appropriate examination body. Clear review methods, comprehensive review scope, strict review standards, standardized review procedures, and effective review results.
【作者单位】：苏州大学王健法学院;
【基金】：上海市高原学科资助项目“行政法”(项目编号:SHZF201501)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】