当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 诉讼法论文 >

论我国知识产权纠纷的仲裁解决

发布时间:2018-05-18 19:44

  本文选题:知识产权 + 仲裁 ; 参考:《太原科技大学》2014年硕士论文


【摘要】:近期,法院对近年来积压的案件进行汇总,发现积压较多的是知识产权类的案件,可知运用诉讼解决此类纠纷有可能会面临着诉讼周期长或做出的判决不够专业等问题。仲裁凭其快捷性、专业性强的优势在世界范围内开始引得人们的重视,在解决知识产权领域内发挥着越来越重要的作用,但仲裁在我国发展的比较晚,,尤其是知识产权仲裁才刚刚起步,并不是所有的知识产权纠纷都能通过仲裁解决,针对不同类型的纠纷要划分不同的可仲裁性标准,所以仲裁在解决知识产权纠纷时也面临着存在不少问题,比如立法上对可仲裁性标准规定的不明确、仲裁中财产保全制度不健全等,实践中缺乏专门的知识产权仲裁机构、公众的仲裁意识不强等。解决某一问题需要对该问题产生的原因进行分析,通过对其他国家的立法状况及实践经验进行研究,可以发现,国外在立法上对可仲裁性的标准、仲裁中采取的财产保全措施的程序规定的很明确,还建立许多专门的仲裁机构,对仲裁的宣传力度也很大,在实践中操作性很强,这对我国仲裁事业的发展有很大的帮助,我们既要在立法上及实践中借鉴他国经验,并与我国的现实情况相结合,同时与其他纠纷解决机制进行协调,使仲裁的优势发挥到最佳状态。
[Abstract]:Recently, the court summarized the backlog of cases in recent years, found that the backlog is more cases of intellectual property rights, we can know that the use of litigation to resolve such disputes may face a long litigation cycle or the decision is not professional and other issues. By virtue of its rapidity and professionalism, arbitration begins to attract people's attention in the world and plays an increasingly important role in the field of intellectual property rights. However, arbitration develops relatively late in our country. In particular, intellectual property arbitration is just in its infancy. Not all intellectual property disputes can be resolved through arbitration. Different arbitrability standards should be assigned to different types of disputes. Therefore, arbitration also faces many problems in resolving intellectual property disputes. For example, the legislative provisions on arbitrability standards are not clear, the property preservation system in arbitration is not perfect, and there is a lack of specialized intellectual property arbitration institutions in practice. The public's consciousness of arbitration is not strong. To solve a certain problem, we need to analyze the causes of the problem, and through the study of the legislative situation and practical experience of other countries, we can find that the foreign countries have the standards of arbitrability in legislation. The procedure for property preservation measures adopted in arbitration is very clear, and many specialized arbitration institutions have also been set up. The publicity for arbitration is also very strong, and it is very operational in practice. This is of great help to the development of arbitration in our country. We should draw lessons from the experience of other countries in legislation and practice, and combine with the reality of our country, at the same time, coordinate with other dispute settlement mechanism, so as to bring the advantage of arbitration into full play.
【学位授予单位】:太原科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D925.7;D923.4

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前2条

1 郭晓燕;;非诉讼纠纷解决方式建构缘由探析[J];山东省青年管理干部学院学报;2008年04期

2 黄晖;;知识产权可仲裁性的发展趋势论[J];仲裁研究;2013年01期



本文编号:1906962

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/susongfa/1906962.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户61eca***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com