调解协议司法不变更原则之反思

发布时间：2018-05-18 19:33

本文选题：司法不变更原则 + 意思自治　；参考：《学习论坛》2017年04期

【摘要】：尽管实体法学者早已注意到适用意思自治原则的社会条件并不完全具备,但是不少民诉法学者仍然沉浸在处分权主义的美梦中,并据此主张在调解协议司法审查环节中采取司法不变更原则。在当事人缺乏平等协商根基的情形下,强化对社会弱势群体的特殊保护以及对基本法律价值的维护就显得尤为重要。在诉讼外调解层次多元、程序随意且保密的语境下,承担调解协议存在瑕疵事由证明责任的当事人或者案外人并不足以接近证据。调解协议无效事由的公益性、调解协议司法确认程序的非讼性共同奠定法院职权主义的正当性基础。即使在私益性调解协议司法审查程序中,当事人仍得借助申请法院调查取证权克服其举证困难。
[Abstract]:Although scholars of substantive law have long noticed that the social conditions for applying the principle of autonomy of will are not fully available, many scholars of civil litigation are still immersed in the dream of disposition right doctrine. And accordingly advocates in the mediation agreement judicial review link to adopt the judicial not to change the principle. Under the condition that the parties lack the foundation of equal negotiation, it is particularly important to strengthen the special protection of the social vulnerable groups and the maintenance of the basic legal value. In the context of multiple levels of mediation outside of litigation and arbitrary and confidential procedures, the parties or outsiders who bear the burden of proving the existence of defects in the mediation agreement are not sufficient to approach the evidence. The commonweal nature of the invalid mediation agreement and the non-litigation nature of the judicial confirmation procedure of the mediation agreement jointly lay the legitimacy foundation of the court's doctrine of authority. Even in the procedure of judicial review of private mediation agreement, the parties still have to use the right to apply for court investigation to obtain evidence to overcome their difficulties of proof.
【作者单位】：六盘水师范学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“迈向制度理性的民事程序研究”(14CFX028) 六盘水师范学院科研计划资助项目(LPSSY201309)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】